feat: Update function setting style

[wangdan-fit2cloud]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The code appears to be well-written and mostly functional, but there are a few minor issues that could potentially improve readability or performance:

1. Use of as keyword: In TypeScript, it's not recommended to use the as keyword for type assertions. You can directly assign types using the colon (:).

   class A {}
   
   let a: A = new A() // Correct

2. Unnecessary semicolons: While semicolons at the end of statements are syntactically required, they do not need to be included unless absolutely necessary.

3. Empty comment block: The empty comment block between lines 105 and 106 doesn't contribute anything useful and should likely be removed.

4. Unused variables: It seems like some unused variables (currentIndex, permissionTypes, etc.) have been added without being used throughout the component.

Here is an optimized version of the relevant section with these improvements:

<template>
  <el-drawer
    v-model="drawerVisible"
    size="50%"
    @close="onCloseDrawer"
    append-to-body
  >
    <template #header slot-scope="{ close }">
      {{ title }}
      <el-button @click="close" style="float: right; padding: 0;">X</el-button>
    </template>

    <div class="px-8 pb-2">...</div> <!-- Continue rest -->

<script lang='ts'>
// Import statements remain unchanged

const currentStepValue = ref<number>(0);
const permissionTypes = [
  PermissionType.Public,
  PermissionType.Protected,
  PermissionType.Private,
] as number[] | string[];

function onChange(current_step_index_num) {
  currentStepValue.value = parseInt(String(current_step_index_num), 10);
}

function onRefresh(stepIndexNum?: number): void {
  refreshInitFieldList();

  if (stepIndexNum > currentIndex.value) return;

  currentIndex.value = stepIndexNum;
}
//

These changes make the code cleaner and more maintainable while maintaining its functionality.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code is mostly clean and well-structured, but there are a few changes recommended to improve readability and maintainability:

1. Remove Unused Variables: The internalDescRef variable seems unused at this point. You can delete it from the script section.

2. Simplify Function Calls: Remove unnecessary parentheses in calls like (item.permission_type === 'PUBLIC' && !canEdit(item)).

3. Consistent Indentation: Ensure consistent indentation throughout the file to improve legibility. This might involve fixing inconsistencies between tab spaces and regular spaces.

Revised JavaScript Code

<template>
  <div class="function-lib-list-container p-24" style="padding-top: 16px">
    <el-tabs v-model="functionType">
      <el-tab-pane :label="$t('views.functionLib.title')" name="PUBLIC"></el-tab-pane>
      <el-tab-pane :label="$t('views.functionLib.internalTitle')" name="INTERNAL"></el-tab-pane>
    </el-tabs>

    <!-- ... rest of the template remains unchanged ... -->
  </div>
</template>

<script lang='ts'>
import { defineComponent } from 'vue';
// Import other necessary components and modules here ...

const Component = defineComponent({
  setup(props, context) {
    // Your existing setup logic here ...
    
    return {
      // Existing data, methods, etc. remain unchanged
      functionType: ref('PUBLIC'),
      loading: ref(false),
      canEdit,
      changeState,
      copyFunctionLib,
      exportFunctionLib,
      configPermission,
      searchHandle,
      openCreateDialog,
      getImageUrl,
      openDescDrawer,
    };
  },
});

In case you have further questions or need additional help with optimization, feel free to ask!

[shaohuzhang1]

No significant issues were found in the provided CSS code snippet. It appears to be properly formatted and contains no syntax errors or missing components. The structure of the el-radio-group with nested radio buttons is correct, ensuring that users can choose between "continueQuestioning" or "provideAnswer". There are also two instances where duplicate content has been removed for consistency.

This CSS should work as intended without further modifications. If you need to implement any specific changes based on additional context, I'd be happy to help suggest those!