-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
perf: Optimize packaging #3903
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
perf: Optimize packaging #3903
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| ) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| const inner = reactive(file) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The given JavaScript function uploadFile has several checks to handle file uploads, including limits on number of files, file size, and warning messages for excessive limit usage or invalid file sizes.
-
Code Review:
- The logic for filtering out empty files (
fileLimitOncereached) is correct. - The size filter seems redundant since it mirrors the initial size condition after processing duplicates from step 1.
- Consider combining duplicate conditions into a single check if they are essentially the same.
- The logic for filtering out empty files (
-
Optimization Suggestions:
- Single Size Filter: Since both conditions involve checking against
fileLimit, you can consolidate them into one loop using a helper function or by directly returning without an additional conditional if applicable.
- Single Size Filter: Since both conditions involve checking against
-
Additional Enhancements:
- Add timestamps for each processed file to keep track of when different types (audio, video, other) were appended. This could be useful for logging purposes or future features like auto-updating display order based on time stamps.
- Implement error handling around file reading operations to ensure robustness during upload processes.
Here's a revised version with minor adjustments:
const uploadFile = async (file: any, fileList: any): Promise<void> => {
const uploadedCount =
uploadAudioList.value.length +
uploadVideoList.value.length +
uploadOtherList.value.length;
if (uploadedCount >= maxFiles) {
MsgWarning(`${t('chat.uploadFile.limitMessage1')} ${maxFiles} ${t('chat.uploadFile.limitMessage2')}`);
fileList.splice(0, fileList.length, ...fileList.slice(0, maxFiles));
return;
}
let validFiles = fileList.filter(f => f.size <= fileLimit * 1024 * 1024 && f.size !== 0);
if (validFiles.length === 0) {
msg.Warning(t('chat.uploadFile.emptyValid'));
return;
}
internal.push(...validFiles);
};In this updated version:
- Combining Conditions: Removed redundant size checks that mirror those in previous steps.
- Error Handling: Added a message for zero-valid-files scenario.
These changes improve readability and potentially reduce unnecessary computations without compromising functionality.
| nicknameExist: 'The following nicknames already exist:', | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No significant irregularities, potential issues, or optimization suggestions were found in the provided code snippet. The translation and structure remain consistent throughout. There is no need for further changes.
| .el-select__placeholder { | ||
| color: var(--el-text-color-regular); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided CSS rule looks mostly correct for styling an .el-select component within an .el-input-group__prepend. A few minor optimizations and cleanups can be made:
- Remove redundant background styles:
-.el-input-group__prepend div.el-select .el-select__wrapper {- Ensure consistent indentation and formatting.
Here's the optimized version of your code:
.el-input-group__prepend div.el-select .el-select__wrapper {
--el-bg-color-overlay: transparent; /* Add missing property if needed */
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); /* Fallback to RGBA for older browsers */
&:hover {
--el-bg-color-overlay: transparent;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0); /* Same as hover state */
}
/* Uncomment below to define placeholder color explicitly (if needed):
.el-select__placeholder { */
/* color: var(--el-text-color-regular); */
}These changes make the CSS more concise and ensure better readability. If you're targeting modern browsers that support background-color, removing unnecessary properties like --el-bg-color-overlay with hardcoded values is a good practice. The placeholder style remains commented out unless specifically necessary to override default behaviors from other UI components.
fix: New conversation user, user group should be a mandatory field(#3833)
fix: Filter empty files uploaded during application dialogue(#3836)
fix: License not uploaded, knowledge base hits test interface style issue(#3852)
perf: Optimize packaging