Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Loop node response data

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Sep 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

'loop_type': self.node_params_serializer.data.get('loop_type'),
'status': self.status,
'loop_node_data': self.context.get("loop_node_data"),
'loop_answer_data': self.context.get("loop_answer_data"),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet has several improvements that make it more robust and optimized:

  1. Consistent Naming: Ensure consistency in naming conventions throughout the method. Use snake_case for variable names to improve readability.

  2. Use of get() with Default Values: The use of self.node_params_serializer.data.get('some_key', '') is good because it provides a default value if the key does not exist, avoiding potential errors.

  3. Remove Unnecessary Comments: Remove unnecessary comments like # comment: These only clutter the code without adding any useful information.

  4. Optimize Dictionary Lookup: Since you access node_params_serializer.data multiple times, consider creating a local variable at the beginning of the function if this pattern occurs consistently and improves performance due to repeated dictionary accesses.

Here's an optimized version:

def get_details(self, index: int, **kwargs):
    node_data = self.node.params_serializer.data.copy()
    
    return {
        'name': self.node.properties.get('stepName'),
        "index": index,
        "result": self.context.get('result'),
        'array': node_data.get('array'),  # Assuming array is needed
        'number': node_data.get('number'),  # Assuming number is needed
        "params": self.context.get('params'),
        'run_time': self.context.get('run_time'),
        'type': self.node.type,
        'current_index': self.context.get("index"),
        "current_item": self.context.get("item"),
        'loop_type': node_data.get('loop_type'),
        'status': self.status,
        'loop_node_data': self.context.get("loop_node_data"),
        'loop_answer_data': self.context.get("loop_answer_data")
    }

This version reduces redundancy and makes the code cleaner. It also assumes that array and number are being used; if they don't need to be present all the time, you can adjust accordingly.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit b9ac3b9 into v2 Sep 17, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_loop_node branch September 17, 2025 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants