fix: Chat log add error

[shaohuzhang1]

fix: Chat log add error --bug=1062388 --user=张展玮 【应用】应用对话日志添加到知识库，无法选择非根目录下的知识库 https://www.tapd.cn/62980211/s/1780716

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code has several areas that may require attention or improvement:

Irregularities/Missing Code:

• Missing closing braces in some functions, such as filter and postKnowledgeHandler.
• Misleading comments indicating incorrect permissions or resources.

Potential Issues:

• The use of new Permission(...) is redundant since Permission seems already defined with these properties.
• The logic to filter items does not handle resource_type correctly for folders; all types should be returned unless otherwise stated.

Optimization Suggestions:

1. Refactor if Statements: Clean up the logic within if statements to reduce complexity and improve readability.
2. Use Template Literals for String Interpolation: Replace inline strings with template literals for better readability and maintainability.

Here's an improved version of the code following these guidelines:

const filter = ref({
  min_trample: 0,
  comparer: 'and',
});

// Refine postKnowledgeHandler function
function postKnowledgeHandler(knowledgeList: Array<any>): Array<any> {
  return knowledgeList.filter((item): boolean => {
    if (apiType.value === 'workspace') {
      // Ensure only non-folder items meet the permission criteria
      return (
        item.resource_type !== 'folder' &&
        hasPermission([
          PermissionConst.WORKSPACE_MANAGE.getWorkspaceRole(),
          new Permission("KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT:READ+EDIT").getWorkspacePermission('WORKSPACE'),
          new Permission("KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT:READ+EDIT").getWorkspaceResourcePermission('KNOWLEDGE', item.id),
        ])
      );
    } else if (apiType.value === 'systemManage') {
      return hasPermission([RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.RESOURCE_KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT_EDIT], 'OR');
    }
  });
}

function filterChange(val: string) {
  if (val === 'clear') {
    // Clear filtering logic here if needed
  }
}

By addressing these points, you can enhance the clarity, efficiency, and accuracy of the codebase, contributing to its robustness and performance.

[shaohuzhang1]

There are no significant issues with the code provided. However, I have some minor suggestions for improvement:

Optimizations:

1. Improve Prompt Structure: Add a more descriptive title to the promptTemplates section, indicating what it contains.

Updated Code snippet:

# 角色设定：
角色概述和主要职责的一句话描述（请根据具体需要填写）

// 重置按钮点击事件处理函数
const reAnswerClick = () => {
  if (originalUserInput.value) {
-    generatePrompt('结果不满意,请按照格式,重新生成')
+    generatePrompt(
      `上一次回答不满意。请针对原始问题 "${originalUserInput.value}" 并结合对话记录，严格按照格式规范重新生成。`
    )
  }
}

Final Result:

After these improvements, the code is concise yet retains its intended functionality. The prompt template now includes a brief description, and the re-answer click event logic has been updated to include feedback about previous responses and dialogue history.