Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: typos

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Oct 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

>
{{ $t('common.clear') }}
</el-button>
</div>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is generally well-structured, but there are a few small issues and enhancements that could be made:

Issues/Improvements:

  1. Typo in container Attribute:

    • In the <el-anchor> component, the attribute used for the container should be .paragraph-scollbar, not .paragragh-scollar. Ensure consistency with HTML tags.
  2. Redundant Class Naming:

    • Both classes have similar names (el-scrollbar), which might contribute to confusion or redundancy. Consider renaming one of these classes if they serve different purposes.
  3. Consistent Styling and Layout:

    • The layout seems consistent overall, but ensure that the padding on the left sidebar is appropriate and does not cause conflicts elsewhere in your design.

Here's the revised version with these improvements applied:

<template>
  <LayoutContainer show-collapse>
    <template #left>
      <div class="paragraph-sidebar p-16">
        <el-scrollbar class="paragraph-scrollbar">
          <el-anchor
            direction="vertical"
            type="default"
            :offset="130"
            container=".paragraph-scrollbar"
            @click="handleClick"
          >
            <!-- Repeated elements -->
            <template v-for="(item, index) in paragraphDetail" :key="index">
              <!-- Element content here -->
            </template>
          </el-anchor>
        </el-scrollbar>
      </div>
    </template>

    <div class="w-full">
      <!-- Possible changes can occur here regarding empty state display -->

    </div>

    <div style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;">
      <p>{{ $t('common.selected') }} {{ multipleSelection.length }}</p>
      <el-button link type="primary" v-if="multipleSelection.length > 0" @click="multipleSelection = []">
        {{ $t('common.clear') }}
      </el-button>
    </div>
  </LayoutContainer>
</template>

Remember to make necessary adjustments based on the specific context and requirements of your application.

const MoreFilledPermission = () => {
return (
permissionPrecise.value.sync() ||
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code is syntactically correct. It appears to be managing a dropdown menu with options for different search types (creator, name) and handling filtering based on those selections. Here are some general suggestions:

  1. Code Formatting: Ensure consistent indentation throughout your code. While minor adjustments can make the code slightly cleaner, it should maintain readability across different contexts.

  2. Docstring: Consider adding docstrings or comments to describe important sections of the code. This can help others understand its functionality and maintenance needs.

  3. Variable Naming: Consistently use naming conventions such as title instead of $t('views.system.resource_management.type'). Titles should be user-friendly and descriptive.

  4. Function Naming: Use meaningful function names that reflect their purpose. Instead of having long functions like ManagePermission, consider using more specific names that indicate what they do directly (filterPermissions).

  5. Comments: Provide comments to explain complex logic if necessary. For example, explaining why certain checks are performed or when certain operations occur might improve clarity.

Here's an optimized version of the MoreFilledPermission function:

const MoreFilledPermission = () => {
  return (
    permissionPrecise.value.sync() || // Sync permissions data
    permissionPrecise.value.fetchResources() // Fetch resources based on current filters
  );
}

By making these slight improvements, you enhance both readability and maintainability of the codebase.

// sync generete edit export delete
const MoreFilledPermission = () => {
return permissionPrecise.value.delete() || permissionPrecise.value.modify()
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no immediate issue with this code snippet that requires adjustment. However, if you want to optimize it slightly and improve clarity:

const paginationConfig = reactive({
  total: 0,
})

// Suggest renaming generateExportDeletePermissions to make the function name more descriptive
const generateExportDeletePermissions = () => {
  return [
    permissionPrecise.value.delete(),
    permissionPrecise.value.modify(), // Assuming both are booleans or can be truthy/falsy
  ].some(Boolean) || false; // Using Array.prototype.some for a cleaner approach
}

This version uses Array.prototype.some to combine the two checks into one line, which might make the logic easier to read. Note that some(true) will only return true if any element in the array evaluates to truthy; otherwise, it returns false, similar to checking if either condition allows deletion.

Additionally, consider handling edge cases where neither operation (delete nor modify) has access rights differently, depending on your application's requirements.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 70cfd7e into v2 Oct 14, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_typos branch October 14, 2025 04:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants