feat: Dialogue built-in user information function

[shaohuzhang1]

feat: Dialogue built-in user information function

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code has several potential issues and improvements:

Potential Issues:

1. Inconsistent Syntax: The @ symbol is not recognized in Vue.js syntax within this context, which likely indicates an incorrect or outdated example.

2. Extraneous Import: The line import { common } from 'vuex'; does not appear to be used anywhere else, so it can be removed to reduce clutter.

3. Use of Deprecated Imports: The use of defineEmits, onMounted, etc. seems to be based on previous versions of Vue. Current Vue recommends using composition API hooks directly.

4. Unnecessary Window Functions: While useful functions like chatUserProfile are defined, they should be registered properly with the global scope and should ideally not require explicit registration. Consider using Vuex state management instead.

5. Logic Duplication: The logic for getting user profile differs between the mount and before unmount hooks. This duplication could be simplified by combining them into a single method.

Optimization Suggestions:

1. State Management: If you decide to move away from Vuex, consider using Vue 3's Composition API and reactive state.

2. Global Function Registration: Ensure that the window functions are properly registered once and reused throughout your app without repetitive calls.

3. Consistent Code Style: Ensure consistent indentation and naming conventions for better readability.

Here’s an updated version of your code with some optimizations:

// Assuming accessToken and props are already defined elsewhere
import {
  ref,
  computed,
  defineComponent,
  watchEffect,
} from 'vue';
import { useRoute } from 'vue-router';

export default defineComponent({
  setup(props) {
    const route = useRoute();
    const accessToken = '';
    // Other variable declarations

    const handleScroll = () => {
      // Scroll handling logic
      if (scrollPosition.value >= scrollLimit.value) {
        fetchMoreData();
      }
    };

    watchEffect(() => {
      fetchUserData();
    });

    async function fetchUserData() {
      // Logic to fetch user data
    }

    async function fetchMoreData() {
      // Logic to load more data
    }

    return {
      handleScroll,
    };
  },
});

This version uses Vue 3's Composition API features, makes the code cleaner, and avoids unnecessary global function registrations. Adjust variable names and constants as needed for your specific use case.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code appears to be a Pinia store implementation for managing user-related data and chat functionality. There are no significant irregularities or critical issues, but there are some minor improvements that can be made:

1. Unused Import:

   - import { setDefaultClientAppLocale } from '@/configs/ioc'

   This import is not used anywhere in the file. It should either be removed or its purpose identified.

2. Type Declaration Redundancy:

   - type LoginRequest = any;

   If you intend to use any here, it's important to clearly document why if this is intentional. Generally, avoiding type 'any' leads to better type safety and readability.

3. Code Formatting:
   The formatting of the code could be improved for better readability, especially with regard to indentation and spacing around parentheses. Here’s an example of how you might format it slightly more:

interface ChatUser {
  // 用户id
}

const useChatUserStore = defineStore('chat-user', {
  state: () => ({
    /* ... */
  }),
  actions: {
    async getChatUserProfile() {
      const res = await ChatAPI.getChatUserProfile();
      this.chatUserProfile = res.data;
+      return res.data;
    }
  },
});

4. Return Statement Optimization:
   In the applyProfile method,

   applyProfile(responseData: unknown): Partial<AppConfig> | void {
     return responseData ? (responseData.app || null) : undefined;
   }

   If responseData is guaranteed to always be truthy (e.g., due to validation), then returning (responseData.app || null) might simplify the expression since the default value (undefined) will never be returned when responseData.app exists.

These improvements focus on making the code cleaner, easier to read, and potentially safer by reducing unnecessary types and ensuring clear variable names where appropriate.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code snippet is not complete, but I can see that there might be some issues or areas for improvement, especially with type annotations for sendMessage:

1. Type Annotations: The current type annotation for sendMessage uses "?", which is equivalent to "null | undefined". This means that either the function could exist as a regular function without arguments (() => any) or it could be an optional call signature that requires parameters but returns nothing.

   Here's how you can refine the type definition based on whether you expect the function to accept parameters and return something meaningful:

   if (typeof window.sendMessage === 'function') {
     // If window.sendMessage accepts arguments, use this type
     type SendMessage = ((message: string, other_params_data: any) => void);
   } else {
     // If window.sendMessage does not accept arguments, use this type instead
     type SendMessage = () => any;
   }

   Alternatively, if you want to explicitly handle the case where sendMessage might be absent, you can define it separately:

   interface Window extends Record<string, unknown> {
     sendMessage?: ((message: string, other_params_data: any) => void)
     getMaxKB: {
       prefix: string
       chatPrefix: string
     };
     chatUserProfile?: (() => any);
   }

2. Consistency: Ensure that all interfaces are properly closed. In your example, the {...} block at the end should be completed unless they contain additional definitions. Otherwise, just close the curly brace correctly:

   declare module 'katex'
   
   interface Window {
     sendMessage: ?((message: string, other_params_data: any) => void)
     chatUserProfile: ?(() => any)
     
     getMaxKB: {
       prefix: string
       chatPrefix: string
     }
   }

3. Variable/Function Naming Conventions: Make sure that variable names and function signatures adhere to consistent naming conventions within your project. This includes using descriptive names like chatUserProfile rather than simply chatUserProfile.

With these adjustments, your TypeScript code will be more robust, easier to understand, and future-proofed against changes or errors in how the Window object might evolve.