fix: Tool permission

[shaohuzhang1]

fix: Locales
fix: Tool permission

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided TypeScript code snippet appears to be defining permission checks in a complex workflow system. Here are some observations:

1. Permission Changes:
   The original line has two different export permissions being added:

   PermissionConst.TOOL_EXPORT.getToolWorkspaceResourcePermission(source_id)

   This was changed to use an edit instead of an export:

   PermissionConst.TOOL_EDIT.getToolWorkspaceResourcePermission(source_id)

2. Security Concerns:
   Using export can potentially expose sensitive or critical data to un authorized users, especially if source_id is not properly secured.

3. Readability:
   The addition of duplicate workspace.manage-role roles could cause confusion and redundancy. It might be better to consolidate these into fewer roles if possible.

4. Code Structure:
   There aren't any syntax errors but it's good practice to ensure the structure remains consistent and efficient.

Optimization Suggestions:

1. Consolidate Permissions: If there aren't specific reasons to keep both an export and edit role, consider removing one based on the intended function.

2. Secure Source ID Usage: Ensure that source_id is sanitized and appropriately checked during runtime before passing it to methods like getting tool permissions.

Here’s a revised version with those considerations:

const workspace: {
    allowedRolesAndPermissions: Array<{
        conditions: ({ UserRole, WorkspaceRole }: typeof Role) => boolean[],
    }>,
} = {
    [
        new ComplexPermission([Role.User], [Permission.EditToolWorkspaceResourcePermission(source_id)], [], 'AND'),
        Role.WorkspaceManage,
        Permission.EditToolWorkspaceResourcePermission(source_id),
        Permission.EditToolWorkspacePermission(Role.Manage)
    ],
};

Note: Adjusted method names according to updated references, assuming they exist within the context of your codebase.