perf: Memory optimization

[shaohuzhang1]

feat: init knowledge workflow
perf: Memory optimization

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[shaohuzhang1]

There are several optimizations and improvements that can be made to enhance the code:

1. Combine Permissions: Instead of creating individual functions for each action under share, combine them into a single function with parameters that accept different actions.

2. Extract Logic: Create separate helper functions for common logic such as accessing permission objects and permissions checks.

Here's a revised version of the code incorporating these changes:

import { ComplexPermission } from '@/utils/permission/type';
import { RoleConst, PermissionConst } from '@/utils/permission/data';

const haveSharedAccess = (role, permission) => hasPermission([role], permission);

function getPermissions(action: string): PermissionConst[] | null {
    // Map actions to corresponding permission codes based on your data structure
    switch (action) {
        case "create": 
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_CREATE];
        case "sync":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_SYNC];
        case "vector":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_VECTOR];
        case "generate":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_GENERATE];
        case "edit":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_EDIT];
        case "export":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_EXPORT];
        case "delete":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_DELETE];
        case "doc_read":
            return null; // Assuming no specific document read permission exists in this context
        case "problem_create":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_PROBLEM_CREATE];
        case "knowledge_chat_user_edit":
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_CHAT_USER_EDIT];
        case "tag_*": // Handle tag-related operations if applicable
            return [PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_TAG_CREATE]; // Example; might vary by operation
        default:
            console.warn(`No mapping available for action "${action}"`);
            return null;
    }
}

const share = {
    accessChecker: (permissions, role) => new ComplexPermission(permissions).match({ ...role }),

    hasShareAccess: (roleId, action) => {
        const perms = getPermissions(action);
        return perms !== null && this.accessChecker(perms, roleId);
    },

    allAccesses: (roleId) => {
        const rolesAndPerms = Object.keys(RoleConst).filter(roleKey => haveSharedAccess(Number.parseInt(roleKey), RoleConst[roleKey]));
        
        return rolesAndPerms.reduce((acc, curRole) => acc || this.hasShareAccess(curRole, 'any'), false); 
    },
    
    doc_accessors: {},
    generate_doc_accessors: () => {
        const docsActions = ['view', 'edit'];
        
        for(const action of docsActions){
            this.doc_accessors[action] = (source_id:string) => action === "view" ? true : source_id !== undefined && this.allAccesses(source_id);            
        }   
    }

    hitTest: () => false,

    debug: (source_id: string) => true,
};

// Initialize document accessors after generating
this.generate_doc_accessors();

module.exports = share;

Key Changes:

• Separated permissions check logic into getPermissions.
• Combined action-specific permission checking into hasShareAccess method to reduce redundancy.
• Added allAccesses method to simplify checking multiple roles against a combined set of permissions.
• Used ComplexPermission.match() for better performance when checking complex permissions scenarios.

This refactoring will improve readability, maintainability, and potentially optimize permission checking performance.

[shaohuzhang1]

Here are some suggested improvements and corrections for the provided Django settings file:

Changes and Corrections

1. Remove Redundant @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@: This comment seems misplaced.

2. Correct Paths:

   • Ensure that all paths mentioned (BASE_DIR, PROJECT_DIR) point to valid directories within your project.

3. Environment Variables:

   • Replace hardcoded values with environment variables whenever possible. Avoid storing sensitive information such as secrets in plain text.

4. Database Configuration:

   • Check if the database configuration is correct. If using SQLite or another embedded database, make sure its path is correctly specified.

5. Cache Settings:

   • Review the cache configuration (CACHES). Some caches might require additional setup based on the underlying provider (e.g., Redis).

6. Internationalization:

   • Ensure that the locale directory exists and contains appropriate translation files (.mo).

7. Static Files:

   • Verify that the staticfiles collection command is working correctly. Run python manage.py collectstatic.

8. Default Auto Field:

   • Use 'django.db.models.AutoField' unless you have specific reasons to change it.

9. Redis Sentinel Configuration:

   • If using Redis Sentinel, ensure the connection factory is set correctly.

Optimization Suggestion

• Use Environment Vars for Secrets: Store sensitive information like SECRET_KEY and database credentials as environment variables rather than hardcoding them in the settings.

  MAXKB_SECRET_KEY="your_secret_key"
  MAXKB_DB_HOST="localhost"
  

• Enable Debug Mode Only in Development: In production, disable debug mode by setting DEBUG=False.

DEBUG = False

• Optimize Caching:

  • For Redis-based caching, consider increasing the timeout and connection pooling size depending on expected load.

• Lazy Loading Translations: Utilize lazy loading for translations where it makes sense.

By addressing these points and ensuring consistent practices, the quality of your Django project will improve significantly.

[shaohuzhang1]

There appear to be a few minor issues and opportunities for improvement in the provided Vue template and script:

Issues:

1. Typo: In the tooltip of el-button: The icon name should be "appMore" not "app-more". This might lead to unexpected behavior.

2. Missing Import Statements: Ensure all used components (CommonList, WriteRead`, etc.) have been imported at the beginning of the script.

3. Unused Code: The functiondatetimeFormat is defined but not referenced anywhere, which may indicate it's unnecessary.

4. Event Emitter Call Order: When using emit('click', item) inside hooks like mounted, you might want to ensure that this does not block other lifecycle methods, though typically it shouldn't.

5. Variable Naming Convention: While not critical, it would help readability if consistent naming conventions were maintained throughout the codebase.

6. Code Duplication: There's some duplication between logic related to dropdown visibility and clicking list items.

Improvements Suggestions:

1. Update Icon Names:

   <AppIcon iconName="appMore"></AppIcon>

2. Import Missing Components (assuming they exist):
   Add necessary imports at the top of the file where these components are being used, e.g.,

   import CommonList from './components/CommonList.vue'; // Assuming 'CommonList' exists
   import ReadWrite from './components/ReadWrite.vue';
   // ...

3. Remove Unreferenced Function:
   Remove or comment out unused functions unless they actually serve a purpose outside their context.

4. Consistent Event Handling:
   If there's a need for event handling, make sure there aren't any unintended side effects or blocking operations occurring in the same scope where an event handler is triggered.

5. Refactor Duplicated Logic:
   Consider refactoring sections of code with similar functionality into separate helper functions if needed to improve readability and maintainability.

Overall, ensuring consistency in coding styles, proper variable names, correct component usage, and optimizing event handling patterns can help maintain better quality and reduce potential bugs.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment