-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: Allow problem be blank #4374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Allow problem be blank #4374
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| 'status': self.status, | ||
| 'err_message': self.err_message | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There seem to be a couple of potential issues in your code that could be addressed:
-
Problem List Field: The
problem_listfield should allow blank entries if it's supposed to represent multiple problems or tasks associated with a paragraph.problem_list = serializers.ListField( required=False, child=serializers.CharField(required=False, allow_blank=True) )
-
Empty Return Statement in get_paragraph_problem_model Function: There might be an unhandled case that results in no data being returned from
get_paragraph_problem_model. -
Return Statements in Class Methods:
- Some methods may not have been executed correctly due to return statements that do not align with their expected use (e.g., within loops).
Here’s how you can address these points with corrections:
Code Corrections
def get_paragraph_problem_model(knowledge_id: str, document_id: str, instance: Dict):
# Placeholder implementation; adjust based on actual requirements
paragraphs = []
for paragraph in instance['paragraphs']:
print(f"Creating paragraph model for {knowledge_id}, {document_id}")
paragraphs.append({
"title": paragraph.get('title'),
"problem_list": [
task.strip() for task in paragraph.get('task', '').split(',') if task.strip()
],
# Add additional fields as needed
})
return paragraphs
# Adjust other methods similarly if necessary
class ParagraphInstanceSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
...
problem_list = serializers.ListField(
required=False,
child=serializers.CharField(required=False, allow_blank=True)
)
# Ensure all methods call super().__init__() and handle exceptions appropriately
def execute(self, documents, **kwargs) -> NodeResult:
try:
...
result_content = {
'write_content': write_content_list,
# Add more keys/values as appropriate
}
self.add_to_write_context(result_content) # Assuming this method exists somewhere
return NodeResult(result_content, {}) # This assumes NodeResult takes two parameters (success/data/error)
except Exception as e:
self.err_message(str(e))
return NodeResult({}, {"error": str(e)})Additional Suggestion
-
Exception Handling: Implement robust exception handling throughout your code to catch unexpected errors and ensure proper cleanup when something goes wrong.
-
Validation Logic: Consider adding validation logic before saving changes to ensure that the input meets expectations.
-
Code Structure: Simplify complex operations in functions like
executeorsave_by_doc_ids_if_neededby breaking down these responsibilities into smaller, focused functions.
By addressing these areas, your code becomes more robust, maintainable, and likely performs better under real-world conditions.
fix: Allow problem be blank