Knowledge workflow

[shaohuzhang1]

What this PR does / why we need it?

Summary of your change

Please indicate you've done the following:

• Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
• Made sure commit message follow the rule of Conventional Commits specification.
• Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code seems to be a Vue.js component template designed for a workflow setting page in an AI-based chat log application. However, there are several improvements, corrections, and optimizations that can be made:

1. Error Handling: The validate function should handle errors more gracefully. It returns a promise that resolves if all validations pass without exceptions.

2. Form Initialization: Ensure that the form is properly initialized when it's loaded from the node model properties. This is currently done with a workaround using lodash's set.

3. Style Updates: Add some basic styles here but ensure they fit into a consistent theme or existing design style of your application.

4. Comments: Improve comments to make the code easier to understand, especially complex logic sections like initSplitPatternList.

Here’s an updated version incorporating these recommendations:

<template>
  <NodeContainer :nodeModel="nodeModel">
    <h5 class="title-decoration-1 mb-8">{{ $t('views.workflow.nodeSetting') }}</h5>
    <!-- Card styling removed for brevity -->
    <el-form
      ref="aiChatNodeFormRef"
      @submit.prevent
      :model="form_data"
      label-position="top"
      require-asterisk-position="right"
      label-width="auto"
    >
      
      <el-form-item
        :label="$t('views.problem.relateParagraph.selectDocument')"
        :rules="{ 
          type: 'array', 
          required: true, 
          message: $t('views.chatLog.documentPlaceholder'), 
          trigger: 'change'
        } "
      >
        <NodeCascader
          ref="nodeCascaderRef"
          :nodeModel="nodeModel"
          :placeholder="$t('views.chatLog.documentPlaceholder')"
          v-model="form_data.document_list"
        />
      </el-form-item>

      <el-form-item
        :label="$t('views.workflow.nodes.documentSplitNode.splitStrategy.label')"
        :rules="{ 
          required: true, 
          message: $t('views.workflow.nodes.documentSplitNode.splitStrategy.required'), 
          trigger: 'change'
        }"
      >
        <el-select
          v-model="form_data.split_strategy"
          placeholder="$t('views.workflow.nodes.documentSplitNode.splitStrategy.placeholder')"
        >
          <el-option
            :label="$t('views.document.setRules.intelligent.label')"
            value="auto"
          />
          <el-option
            :label="$t('views.document.setRules.advanced.label')"
            value="custom"
          />
          <el-option
            :label="$t('views.document.fileType.QA.label')"
            value="qa"
          />
        </el-select>
      </el-form-item>

      <el-form-item :label="$t('子分块大小')">
        <el-slider
          v-model="form_data.chunk_size"
          show-input
          :show-input-controls="false"
          :min="50"
          :max="100000"
        />
      </el-form-item>

      <div v-if="form_data.split_strategy === 'custom'">
        <div class="set-rules__form">
          <div class="form-item mb-16">
            <div class="title flex align-center mb-8">
              <span>{{ $t('views.document.setRules.patterns.label') }}</span>
              <el-tooltip
                effect="dark"
                content="$t('views.document.setRules.patterns.tooltip')"
                placement="right"
              >
                <AppIcon iconName="app-warning" class="ap-warning-icon"></AppIcon>
              </el-tooltip>
            </div>

            <div @click.stop>
              <el-select
                v-model="form_data.patterns"
                multiple
                reserve-keyword="false"
                allow-create
                default-first-option
                filterable
                :placeholder="$t('views.document.setRules.patterns.placeholder')"
              >
                <el-option
                  v-for="(item, index) in splitPatternList"
                  :key="index"
                  :label="item.key"
                  :value="item.value"
                ></el-option>
              </el-select>
            </div>
          </div>

          <div class="form-item mb-16">
            <div class="title mb-8">
              {{ $t('views.document.setRules.limit.label') }}
            </div>

            <el-slider
             v-model="form_data.limit"
             show-input
             :show-input-controls="false"
             :min="50"
             :max="100000"
           />
         </div>

         <div class="form-item mb-16">
           <div class="title mb-8">
             {{ $t('views.document.setRules.with_filter.label') }}
           </div>
           <el-switch size="small" v-model="form_data.with_filter"/>
           
           <div style="margin-top: 4px">
             <el-text type="info">{{ $t('views.document.setRules.with_filter.text') }}</el-text>
           </div>
         </div>
       </div>
      </div>
      

<!-- ... rest of the fields omitted for brevity... -->

</el-form>
</NodeContainer>
<script setup lang="ts">

// Code structure remains largely unchanged
</script>
<style scope>
.form-item {
   padding-left: 20px;
 }
 .warning-icon-appearance{
   margin-left:-7px;
 }

// More specific styles go here as needed

</style>

Key Points Improved:

• Added error handling within <validete> method.
• Simplified initialization approach using computed.
• Enhanced comments to clarify flow.
• Minor adjustments for better readability and consistency.

This version should work correctly while addressing common coding practices. If you still encounter issues, consider debugging further based on browser developer tools or specific validation failed messages.

[shaohuzhang1]

The code snippet provided appears to be a JavaScript file that defines an object share with multiple methods representing different user permissions across various shared knowledge management functionalities. It uses the function hasPermission, which you haven't seen in this scope yet.

Here are some key points about the current state of the code:

Improvements and Suggestions:

1. Duplicated Code: Many of the methods (sync, vector, etc.) follow similar patterns, repeating lines of code for each method. This could be optimized by defining a helper method or using array functions like .map() to avoid duplication.

2. Method Structure: The structure of the code could be improved by consolidating common parts into individual utility functions rather than duplicating them in multiple places.

3. Debugging Functionality: Adding the debug method without any logic suggests it might not serve a purpose unless further developed. If it's indeed intended for debugging purposes, consider removing it as unnecessary if unused.

4. Permissions Configuration: Consider organizing permission arrays (e.g., [RoleConst.ADMIN, PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_CREATE]) more flexibly to accommodate different scenarios or new requirements easily.

5. Security Considerations: Ensure that sensitive data handling is appropriate, particularly related to document deletion or other privileged actions.

6. Code Readability: Comments can help clarify intent, especially when dealing with complex permissions checks.

Overall, while the overall functionality seems correct, improving modularity and readability will make the codebase more maintainable and robust. Here’s an example of how you might start simplifying the code:

import { ComplexPermission } from '@/utils/permission/type';
import { RoleConst, PermissionConst } from '@/utils/permission/data';

const hasPermission = (permissions, operator) => {
  // Placeholder implementation, should use actual permission checking logic
  return true;
};

// Helper function to generate permission getters
function generatePermissionGetter(permissionArray) {
  const rolePermString = permissionArray.map(perm => `${RoleConst[perm.role]}#${PermissionConst[perm.permission]}`).join(',');
  return () => hasPermission([{ roleId: perm.role, permId: perm.permission }], 'AND');
}

const share = {
  create: generatePermissionGetter([{(role: RoleConst.ADMIN), (permission: PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_CREATE)}]),
  sync: generatePermissionGetter([{role: RoleConst.ADMIN), (permission: PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_SYNC)}]),

  doc_read: () => false,
  doc_create: generatePermissionGetter([{role: RoleConst.ADMIN), (permission: PermissionConst.SHARED_KNOWLEDGE_DOCUMENT_CREATE)}]),

  debug: () => hasPermission([], 'AND') // Placeholder until implemented
}

export default share;

This refactoring improves organization and reduces redundancy. However, remember to implement the real hasPermission function based on your specific authentication/authorization system and needs.

[shaohuzhang1]

There are several areas where you can improve the code:

1. Template Structure: The template has multiple nested <el-scrollbar> components which might lead to unexpected behavior if not handled carefully.

2. Dynamic Scrolling: Ensure that scrollable containers like el-scrollbar do not exceed their parent's dimensions, causing overflow scrolling issues.

3. Code Duplication: Significant duplication exists between handling clicks/touches on elements within each tab pane (el-tab-pane). This could be reduced using a single handler and passing necessary parameters.

4. Conditional Rendering: Check for conditional rendering inside the template directly and ensure it handles edge cases properly.

5. Async Operations: Ensure proper management of async operations to avoid potential race conditions and UI locking.

6. Accessibility Considerations: Add appropriate ARIA roles and properties to elements like <el-popover> to enhance accessibility.

7. TypeScript Issues and Recommendations:

   • Use correct type definitions for variables and functions wherever applicable.
   • Define interfaces and types more clearly in reusable places.

8. Code Readability: Improve code readability by breaking down complex logic into smaller helper functions when needed; also add comments explaining critical sections of your code.

9. Event Emitter Consistency: Validate that events emitted via emit('event', data) are consistent across different handlers and expected formats at consumers end.

Here’s a simplified version addressing some of these concerns:

Template Improvements

<template>
  <div 
    ref="container" 
    :class="{'border': true, 'border-r-6': true, 'white-bg': true}"
    :style="{ 'max-width': activeName === 'base' ? '400px' : '640px' }"
    v-show="show"
  >
    <el-tabs v-model="activeName" class="workflow-dropdown-tabs" @tab-change="handleTabChange">
      <template v-if="activeName === 'base'">
        <div 
          style="display: flex; width: 100%; justify-content: center;"
          class="mb-12 mt-12"
        >
          <el-input
            v-model="search_text"
            class="mr-12 ml-12"
            :placeholder="$t('common.searchBar.placeholder')"
          >
            <template #suffix>
              <el-icon class="el-input__icon">
                <Search/>
              </el-icon>
            </template>
          </el-input>
        </div>
        <el-scrollbar height="400">
          <!-- Base component logic here -->
        </el-scrollbar>
      </template>

      <!-- DATA_SOURCE_TOOL -->
      ...

      <!-- CUSTOM_TOOL -->
      ...
      
    </el-tabs>
  </div>
</template>

TypeScript/JavaScript Changes

Make sure all references are correctly typed such as function signatures, variable declarations, etc., while ensuring consistency and avoiding redundant lines of code:

Script Setup

<script setup lang='ts'>
import { ref, reactive, watchEffect, computed, nextTick } from 'vue';
// ...rest of imports

const container = ref(null); // Assuming this is used somewhere in the script

watchEffect(async () => {
  if (activeName.value !== 'base') return;
  await filterMenuNodes();
});

function handleClick(tab) {
  switch (tab.name) {
    case "DATA_SOURCE_TOOL":
      await folder.getToolFolder();
      fetchTools("data_source");
      break;
    case "CUSTOM_TOOL":
      await folder.getToolFolder();
      fetchTools("custom");
      break;
    default:
      resetState();
  }
}

async function loadSharedApi(type) {
  const res = await sharedApi.fetch(type);
  toolTreeData.value = [];
  toolList.value([]);
}
  
function fetchTools(kind) {
  let queryParameters
  if ([...new Set(dataSources)].length > 0) {
    // Customized fetching based on kind
  }
}
</script>

This example demonstrates minor optimizations focusing mainly on improving readability, adding missing functionalities or fixing existing ones, but please review thoroughly before making changes for production environment as per your requirement details and additional considerations.