pref: Remove return content button

[shaohuzhang1]

pref: Remove return content button

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[shaohuzhang1]

There are no obvious irregularities or potential issues with the provided code. However, there are a couple of minor optimizations and suggestions that could be made:

Optimizations/Suggestions

1. Remove Duplicated Message Translation:
   The message requiredMessage appears twice in different places. Consider removing one instance to avoid redundancy.

2. Reduce Duplication in Placeholder Texts:
   Similar placeholder texts appear multiple times. You can extract these into variables for consistency.

3. Consistent Use of Vue Ref/Inject:
   Ensure consistent usage of ref and inject. It's generally better practice to use reactive, computed, etc., based on context.

4. Avoid Direct Usage of String.prototype.includes() in Conditional Checks:
   While not directly related, you might consider using an enum-like approach with symbols or a mapping object instead of direct string checks.

Here's an improved version of the relevant part:

// Extracting translations into constants for clarity
const REQUIRED_MESSAGE_KEY = 'views.workflow.nodes.imageToVideoGenerate.' +
                           'model.requiredMessage'
const NEGATIVE_PROMPT_PLACEHOLDER = t(REQUIRED_MESSAGE_KEY)
const LAST_FRAME_REQUIRED_MESSAGE_KEY = 'views.workflow.nodes.imageToVideoGenerate.' +
                                      'last_frame.requiredMessage'

<el-form-item :label="t('views.workflow.nodes.aiChatNode.returnContent.label')" @click.prevent>
  <template #label>
    <div class="flex align-center">
      <div class="mr-4">
        {{ t('views.workflow.nodes.aiChatNode.returnContent.label') }}
      </div>
      <el-tooltip effect="dark" placement="right" popper-class="max-w-200">
        <template #content>
          <!-- Tooltip content -->
        </template>
        <AppIcon iconName="app-warning" class="app-warning-icon"></AppIcon>
      </el-tooltip>
    </div>
  </template>
</el-form-item>

<style scoped>
/* Existing styles */
</style>

<script setup lang="ts">
import { ref } from 'vue';
import { computed } from 'vue';
import AppIcon from '$components/AppIcons/icons.vue';

function getSelectedOption() {
  // Implementation logic
}

defineProps<{
  form_data: any;
}>();

interface ModelType {
  ITV?: boolean; // Assuming this is defined elsewhere in your project
}
const modelOptions: Array<ModelType> = /* Initialize model options */;
// ... other props and methods ...

// Example usage:
if ([WorkflowMode.Application, WorkflowMode.ApplicationLoop].includes(workflowMode)) {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* Form item */}
    </div>
  );
}
</script>

<!-- Existing imports and components -->

These changes make the code slightly more organized and maintainable while preserving its functionality.

[shaohuzhang1]

The provided code appears to be TypeScript with Vue.js components, likely part of an application that handles workflows. While I can't perform specific linting or analysis on this codebase without additional context (like imports, module dependencies), here are general notes and suggestions for improving it:

1. Consistency: Ensure consistent indentation and spacing throughout the file.

2. Template Literals: Use template literals consistently when interpolating strings in templates to avoid concatenation problems.

3. Arrow Function Syntax: Consistently use arrow functions for callback-based logic (wheel, submitDialog) and event handlers.

4. Type Annotations: Add type annotations where available to improve readability and catch potential errors at compile-time using tools like TypeScripts ESLint plugin.

5. Unused Variables: Remove unused variables or parameters to make the code cleaner.

6. Error Handling: Ensure proper error handling across asynchronous operations, especially if multiple promises need to be resolved sequentially.

Here's a simplified version of some of these improvements:

// File: src/components/form/FormElement.tsx

<template>
  <!-- Form element content -->
</template>

<script lang="ts">
import { computed, defineComponent, reactive } from "vue";

export default defineComponent({
  name: 'FormElement',
  setup() {
    const formData = reactive({});
    
    const handleValidate = async (): Promise<string | null> => {
      try {
        await nodeCascaderRef.value?.validate();
        
        // Additional validation for replyNodeFormRef if needed
        
        return '';
      } catch (err: any) {
        console.error(err);
        return err.message;
      }
    };
    
    const onSubmit = async (val: string): Promise<void> => {
      if (await handleValidate()) {
        // Proceed with submission
        submitDialog(val);
      }
    };
    
    return {
      formData,
      handleSubmit: handleSubmit,
    };
  },
});
</script>

Make sure to adjust the names and structure according to your actual component hierarchy and requirements. For more detailed analysis and optimizations, consider running static code analysis tooling with appropriate configurations.

[shaohuzhang1]

The code you provided is largely syntactically correct and does not contain any major problems. However, there are a few areas where improvements could be made:

1. Consistent Message Placement: Ensure that all placeholder messages referring to $t('views.workflow.nodes.imageUnderstandNode.model.requiredMessage' or similar messages are consistently used and localized.

2. Duplicated Code: The comment-based documentation at the top of several lines can make them look unnecessary but may indicate important information about the form controls being defined.

3. Optional Placeholder Text: Consider whether it's necessary to include placeholder text if it will always be displayed due to rules defined on the input fields.

4. Logical Consistency: Verify that the logic inside functions like getResourceDetail and others is functioning as intended without unexpected side effects.

5. Dynamic Usage: Ensure that dynamic imports (e.g., [WorkflowMode.Application, WorkflowMode.ApplicationLoop].includes(workflowMode)) are correctly implemented according to Vue.js injection patterns and TypeScript types.

Overall, these checks should help ensure robustness and maintainability of the code. Make sure to review each section again after implementing the suggested changes to confirm everything works as expected with your specific use cases.