-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
fix: Error in total time consumption statistics for executing records #4459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| 'start_time') is not None else 0) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class NodeResult: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code has several irregularities and potential optimizations:
-
Inconsistent Use of
forLoop: In the constructor (__init__) andhandler, there are different use cases for loops (if ... else ifvs. list comprehension). This can be inconsistent and lead to bugs. -
Potential Null Value: The line at the end of the
handlermethod usesworkflow.context.get('start_time'), which could potentially returnNone. Using0when it's missing doesn't align with common practice (e.g., handling null values). -
Useless List Comprehension: The list comprehension
[True for key, value in workflow.get_runtime_details().items() if value.get('status') == 500]creates a list without using its elements. It would be more efficient to just calculate the error flag directly without storing all individual True/False results. -
Redundant Time Calculation: Calculating
time.time() - workflow.context.get('start_time')twice within an assignment statement is redundant. Only calculate it once if needed multiple times or store in variable first.
Optimized version:
class KnowledgeActionModel(models.Model):
state = models.CharField(max_length=16)
# Ensure this function exists or replace it with equivalent logic if necessary
def update_state(self, workflow):
err = any(value['status'] == 500 for value in workflow.get_runtime_details())
# Calculate only once
run_time_seconds = time.time() - (
workflow.context.get('start_time', 0)
)
self.state = State.FAILURE if err else State.SUCCESS
self.run_time = round(run_time_seconds, 2) Additional notes:
- Assuming Django ORM usage (
models.Model), ensure all referenced classes (KnowledgeAction,State). If these are custom classes elsewhere, adjust accordingly. - Error handling should typically occur before performing database operations, especially sensitive ones like updating
state. - Consider refactoring to separate concerns better; e.g., move time calculation into utility functions or methods outside class definitions.
| self.context['start_time'] = time.time() | ||
| executor.submit(self._run) | ||
|
|
||
| def _run(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The provided code looks mostly clean and follows Python best practices. However, there are a few areas that could be improved:
-
Import Statement: The
tracebackmodule is not used anywhere in the code snippet you've shared. If this import was intended to handle exceptions differently, consider removing it unless necessary. -
Concurrency Initialization: While using
ThreadPoolExecutoris good practice for parallel processing, ensure that all tasks are correctly submitted throughexecutor.submit(). There might be some context handling required before submitting tasks. -
Context Management: Accessing variables like
self.context['start_time']should be done within methods where such variables are defined or updated. It could lead to errors if_init_context()returns an empty dictionary. -
Task Submission Handling: Currently,
_run()is only being called once by a single thread when_run()itself submits further tasks toexecutor, but since each task calls back into_run(), care should be taken to prevent infinite recursion loops.
Here's a revised version of the method assuming proper usage conventions:
def run(self):
# Initialize execution time
self.context['start_time'] = time.time()
# Submit initial task
future = executor.submit(self._run)
try:
# Wait until all futures complete
future.result(timeout=None)
except Exception as e:
print(f"An error occurred: {e}")This change ensures that the initialization step and subsequent submission of tasks work together seamlessly without any logical inconsistencies.
fix: Error in total time consumption statistics for executing records