Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: The local file node of the knowledge base workflow has not been verified

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 merged commit 1a303ff into v2 Dec 8, 2025
3 of 6 checks passed
})
</script>

<style lang="scss" scoped></style>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are no noticeable logical errors in the provided code snippet. However, there is one minor issue and an optimization suggestion:

Issues Found:

  1. TypeScript ref Usage: The <template> uses ref, which might not be necessary since you're directly using it in JavaScript without assigning to a template variable.

Optimization Suggestions:

  1. Avoid Assigning Validation Method Directly: In Vue 3 Composition API with TypeScript, it's generally better practice to pass functions through props rather than assigning them directly as instance methods. This makes testing easier and keeps component logic cleaner.

Here's how you can address these points:

Updated Code:

<template>
  <el-form
    :model="form_data"
    label-align="left"
    inline
    label-position="top"
    require-asterisk-position="right"
    label-width="auto"
    ref="NodeFormRef"
  >
    <!-- Form items here -->
  </el-form>
</template>

<script setup lang="ts">
import NodeContainer from '@/workflow/common/NodeContainer.vue'
import { computed } from 'vue'

const file_type_list_options = [
  'TXT',
  'DOCX',
  'PDF',
  'HTML',
  'XLS',
  'XLSX',
  'ZIP',
  'CSV',
]

export default defineComponent({
  components: {
    NodeContainer,
  },
  setup(props) {
    // Refs should only be used when needed
    const NodeFormRef = ref(null)

    const form_data = computed<any>({
      get() {
        return props.nodeModel?.properties || {}
      },
      set(value) {
        set(props.nodeModel?.properties || {}, 'node_data', value)
      },
    })

    const validate = () => {
      return NodeFormRef.value.validate()
    }

    onMounted(() => {
      // Optionally, if needed, assign validation function to properties object
      // But this might be overkill given that we already have a ref-based approach
      //
      // If required outside of this component scope, consider moving into another utility function/module

      // Example usage: `props.nodeModel.validate(file_form_data)`
    })

    return {
      NodeFormRef,
      form_data,
      validate,
    }
  },
})
</script>

<style lang="scss" scoped></style>

Key Changes:

  1. Removed Unused ref Assignment:

    const NodeFormRef = ref()
  2. Encapsulated Validation Logic:
    Moved the validation logic into the setup function where it can be passed down via props or other means as needed.

  3. Consistent Syntax for Computed Properties:
    Changed the way computed is defined inside the setup function to make it more consistent with typical setups.

@shaohuzhang1 shaohuzhang1 deleted the pr@v2@fix_data_local_node_valid branch December 8, 2025 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants