Skip to content

Conversation

@shaohuzhang1
Copy link
Contributor

fix: Error thrown when adding voice model

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@f2c-ci-robot
Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Dec 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

model = provider.get_model(model_type, model_name, model_credential, **model_params)
model.check_auth()
except Exception as e:
maxkb_logger.error(f'Exception: {e}', exc_info=True)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code seems to have a few potential issues and opportunities for improvement:

  1. Function Signature: The function is_valid takes multiple arguments but only uses the last one (**model_params) explicitly. It may be better to use all parameters or document which ones can potentially be passed.

  2. Type Annotations: Adding type annotations to the parameter signature (model_type, etc.) could help make the code more understandable and maintainable.

  3. Error Handling: While logging errors using maxkb_logger.error is good, it might also be useful to catch specific exceptions that you want to handle differently (e.g., connection timeouts).

  4. Code Formatting: Ensure consistent formatting around comments and braces to improve readability.

Here's an optimized version of the code with these suggestions:

from typing import Dict

class YourClass:
    def __init__(self):
        self.provider = # Initialize your provider here

    def is_valid(
        self,
        model_type: str,
        model_name: str,
        model_credential: str,
        model_params: Dict[str, str]  # You might define some default values if needed
    ) -> bool:
        try:
            model = self.provider.get_model(model_type, model_name, model_credential, **model_params)
            model.check_auth()
        except NotImplementedError as e:
            # Handle this exception separately if necessary
            raise e
        except Exception as e:
            maxkb_logger.error(f"Exception during model instantiation: {str(e)}", exc_info=False)

        return True  # Assuming everything works fine

Additional Recommendations:

  • Use Default Values: If certain parameters like maxkb_logger can be set at instance level or initialized elsewhere, consider adding default values or handling them appropriately.
  • Logging Configuration: Ensure that maxkb_logger has been properly configured before calling maxkb_logger.error.
  • Dependency Injection: If possible, pass any dependencies needed by methods through constructor initialization rather than relying on class fields.

By making these changes, the code becomes more robust, easier to understand, and prepared for additional development scenarios.

model = provider.get_model(model_type, model_name, model_credential, **model_params)
model.check_auth()
except Exception as e:
maxkb_logger.error(f'Exception: {e}', exc_info=True)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code snippet provided has a minor issue that should be addressed for clarity and potential errors. Specifically, it's recommended to replace the current line:

model = provider.get_model(model_type, model_name, model_credential)

with this updated version:

model = provider.get_model(provider=model_type, name=model_name, credential=model_credential)

This change improves readability by clearly separating each parameter in the provider.get_model call. Also, if get_model function requires additional parameters (**model_params) beyond provider, they can now be passed without causing confusion about what is actually being set as an argument.

For general improvements, the exception handling could be more robust. While your current implementation catches exceptions globally, it might not be specific enough for all possible error scenarios. It would beneficial to catch specific exceptions related to authentication or data fetching errors so you can handle them differently based on their nature. For instance:

try:
    # Call with required args and also any optional kwargs if needed
    model = provider.get_model(provider=model_type, name=model_name, credential=model_credential)

except AuthenticationError as auth_error:
    maxkb_logger.error('Authentication Error', exc_info=True)
    log_to_external_system(auth_error)  # Send details to external system if necessary

# Continue processing based on success or other specific needs
elif not isinstance(model, YourExpectedModelType):
    maxkb_logger.error('Invalid Model Type')
else:
    model.check_auth()

except DataFetchingError as df_error:
    maxkb_logger.error('Data Fetching Error:', exc_info=True)
else:
    # Process successfully fetched model here

Replace YourExpectedModelType, log_to_external_system() ,and any other placeholders with appropriate class names or functions used in your actual application. This provides more granular control over error handling within the context of validating and accessing models.

@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 merged commit 4c0132a into v2 Dec 9, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@zhanweizhang7 zhanweizhang7 deleted the pr@v2@fix_raise_error branch December 9, 2025 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants