Replies: 7 comments 8 replies
-
I've actually never used it and I do not even really know what it does. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I still use it, but could probably find a better workflow with one of the input generators. I just never had the time to look into it, and my |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am not using it any more. For cubit/coreform as mesh generator, I (and I think most of the IMCS developers) use CubitPy which has an equivalent to pre-exodus coded in python. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
#652 implements a first version of direct exodus support in 4C :) I believe we can get rid of pre_exouds this way with a superior alternative. The details will likely change a little bit over the next PRs and not all physics work yet. Feel free to have a look and participate with your ideas or requirements. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is a nice tutorial by @ischeider for the direct Exodus input! https://4c-multiphysics.github.io/4C/documentation/tutorials/tut_solid.html# I believe at this point we can conclude that we can remove |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
See #751 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@4C-multiphysics/developers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Within #598, we need to decide how we want to proceed with
pre_exodus
. Let's use this discussion to get feedback from @4C-multiphysics/developers.Do we need pre_exodus?
pre_exodus
and think you still need it, i.e., none of the input generators do your job (or you don't know about it yet?)Some technical aspects
pre_exodus
work with a yaml header and emit a yaml input file. Still, if there are no users we should consider dropping this rather dated workflow.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions