HOOKS vs. Passing Logger-Instance to Instructor #1238
timothytrust
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Also another addition to this discussion: I would love to pass a dedicated logger for the Hook to use. Currently, it just feels hacky & the docs "print" stuff to console, which is not production ready in my opinion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
HOOKS are great
I really love the introduction of Hooks, as it lets me hook specific information from the instructor-instance and log information about my program and how it behaves. Thank you for the introduction of hooks.
Question: why not support logging-instances?
What I am missing in this context: why can't I pass a specific logging-instance, which the Instructor instance will adopt to perform all logging operations? Currently, lots of instructor files simply generate a new logging instance up top of the file and creates a new logger, wich is not desired in my program.
Feature Request: support the passing of an optional logger, which can be passed by the user to also log instructor related debuging / information with that specific logger.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions