@@ -9,6 +9,181 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
99
1010---
1111
12+ ## [ 0.9.1] - 2025-11-18
13+
14+ ### 🎯 Generator Pattern Clarification (Supplement to v0.9.0)
15+
16+ ** Proposal ID** : PROP-2025-11-18-GENERATOR-PATTERN
17+ ** Date** : 2025-11-18
18+ ** Status** : ✅ Implemented
19+ ** Severity** : HIGH (Architecture-level)
20+ ** Source** : marketing-spec-kit development feedback (continued)
21+ ** Related** : v0.9.0 fixes (supplementary fix)
22+
23+ #### 🚨 Critical Issue
24+
25+ The ` /metaspec.sdd.specify ` command allowed Generator components to be misinterpreted, leading to architectures where Generator creates ** domain content** (posts, articles, emails) instead of ** project files** (specs, constitution, commands).
26+
27+ ** Example from marketing-spec-kit** :
28+ ``` markdown
29+ ### Component: Generator ❌ WRONG
30+ Purpose: Generate marketing content from validated specifications
31+ Features:
32+ - Generate social media posts
33+ - Generate blog articles
34+ - Generate email campaigns
35+ ```
36+
37+ ** MetaSpec's own implementation** (generator.py):
38+ ``` python
39+ """ Generate complete speckit projects from meta-spec definitions."""
40+ # ✅ Generates project files (constitution.md, specs/, README.md)
41+ # ❌ Does NOT generate domain content
42+ ```
43+
44+ #### 🎯 Root Cause
45+
46+ ** Pattern Confusion** : Toolkit vs Domain Application
47+
48+ ```
49+ Specification Toolkit (marketing-spec-kit)
50+ ├─ Generator → Project files ✅
51+ └─ Wrong: Domain content ❌
52+
53+ Domain Application (user's marketing app)
54+ ├─ Generator → Marketing content ✅
55+ └─ Uses specifications from toolkit
56+ ```
57+
58+ ** Key Insight** : When Use Case says "AI-Driven Content Generation":
59+ - ❌ Wrong interpretation: Generate domain deliverables (posts, articles)
60+ - ✅ Correct interpretation: Generate project files and specifications
61+
62+ #### ✅ Implemented Fixes
63+
64+ | Fix | Content | Location | Status |
65+ | -----| ---------| ----------| --------|
66+ | ** Fix 1** | Generator Pattern guidance | ` /metaspec.sdd.specify ` Component 5 | ✅ Done |
67+ | ** Fix 2** | Generator Pattern validation | ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` Dimension L | ✅ Done |
68+
69+ #### 📝 Fix 1: Generator Pattern Guidance (` specify.md.j2 ` )
70+
71+ ** Added Section** : "Generator Pattern - Toolkit vs Domain Tool" (line 2196+)
72+
73+ ** Key Content** :
74+ - ✅ CORRECT: Generate project files (specs, constitution, commands, templates)
75+ - ❌ FORBIDDEN: Generate domain content (posts, articles, emails, marketing content)
76+ - Visual diagram showing toolkit vs domain application separation
77+ - Reference to MetaSpec's own generator.py implementation
78+ - Correct/incorrect template examples
79+ - Correct/incorrect CLI command examples
80+
81+ ** Impact** : Prevents the #1 architectural mistake in toolkit development
82+
83+ #### 🔍 Fix 2: Generator Pattern Validation (` analyze.md.j2 ` )
84+
85+ ** Added Dimension** : L. Generator Pattern Compliance (line 813+)
86+
87+ ** Three Validation Checks** :
88+
89+ ** L1: Generator Purpose Validation** (CRITICAL)
90+ - Detects domain content keywords (posts, articles, emails, marketing content)
91+ - Verifies toolkit keywords (project files, specification structure)
92+ - Reports CRITICAL error if domain pattern detected
93+
94+ ** L2: Template Pattern Validation** (HIGH)
95+ - Detects domain templates (post.j2, article.j2, email.j2)
96+ - Verifies toolkit templates (constitution.j2, spec.yaml.j2)
97+ - Reports HIGH error if domain templates detected
98+
99+ ** L3: CLI Command Pattern Validation** (HIGH)
100+ - Detects domain commands (generate post, generate article)
101+ - Verifies toolkit commands (init <project-dir >, generate spec)
102+ - Reports HIGH error if domain commands detected
103+
104+ ** Example Report** :
105+ ```
106+ ❌ CRITICAL: Generator follows domain content pattern [GEN_PATTERN_001]
107+ Detected: "social media post", "blog article", "email campaign"
108+
109+ Current: "Generate marketing content from specifications"
110+ Expected: "Generate project structure and specification files"
111+
112+ Fix Strategy:
113+ 1. Update Purpose: FROM "Generate marketing content"
114+ TO "Generate project files"
115+ 2. Update Features: FROM "Generate posts/articles/emails"
116+ TO "Generate specs/constitution/commands"
117+ 3. Update Templates: FROM templates/post.j2
118+ TO templates/spec.yaml.j2
119+ 4. Update CLI: FROM {toolkit} generate post
120+ TO {toolkit} init <project-dir>
121+ ```
122+
123+ #### 📊 Implementation Results
124+
125+ ** Code Change Statistics** :
126+ - ` specify.md.j2 ` : +87 lines (Generator Pattern guidance)
127+ - ` analyze.md.j2 ` : +290 lines (Dimension L validation)
128+ - Total: +377 lines
129+
130+ ** Validation Coverage** :
131+ - ✅ Purpose & Features: Anti-pattern keyword detection
132+ - ✅ Templates: Pattern matching for domain vs toolkit templates
133+ - ✅ CLI Commands: Command pattern validation
134+ - ✅ Comprehensive fix guidance with concrete examples
135+
136+ ** Expected Impact** :
137+ - 🎯 Prevents toolkit vs domain application confusion
138+ - ✅ Enforces correct Generator pattern across all speckits
139+ - 📝 Provides actionable fix guidance with error codes
140+ - 🔍 Auto-detects 3 types of pattern violations (purpose, templates, CLI)
141+
142+ #### 🧪 Test Coverage
143+
144+ This enhancement can be validated by:
145+ 1 . ** Regenerate marketing-spec-kit** with v0.10.0
146+ - Expected: ` /metaspec.sdd.specify ` provides clear Generator pattern guidance
147+ - Expected: ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` detects incorrect Generator definition
148+
149+ 2 . ** Run analyze on existing incorrect spec**
150+ - Create spec.md with domain content Generator
151+ - Run ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze `
152+ - Expected: CRITICAL error with GEN_PATTERN_001 and fix guidance
153+
154+ #### 🔄 Migration Path
155+
156+ ** Existing Users** (with incorrect Generator patterns):
157+ - ⚠️ Run ` /metaspec.sdd.analyze ` to detect violations
158+ - ⚠️ Follow fix guidance to correct Generator definition
159+ - ⚠️ This is an architectural issue - requires manual fix
160+
161+ ** New Users** :
162+ - ✅ Follow new guidance in ` /metaspec.sdd.specify `
163+ - ✅ Validation automatically detects mistakes
164+ - ✅ Clear distinction between toolkit and domain application
165+
166+ ** For marketing-spec-kit** :
167+ - Manual fix required (separate from MetaSpec release)
168+ - Update spec.md Generator definition
169+ - Rewrite generator.py to generate project files
170+ - Update templates and CLI commands
171+
172+ #### 📚 Related Resources
173+
174+ - ** Proposal** : ` docs/internal/generator-pattern-clarification-proposal.md `
175+ - ** Original Feedback** : ` marketing-spec-kit/docs/internal/metaspec-generator-misdefinition-feedback.md `
176+ - ** Command Template** : ` src/metaspec/templates/meta/sdd/commands/specify.md.j2 `
177+ - ** Validation Template** : ` src/metaspec/templates/meta/sdd/commands/analyze.md.j2 `
178+
179+ #### 🙏 Acknowledgments
180+
181+ This enhancement addresses a critical architectural pattern discovered during marketing-spec-kit development. It complements the v0.9.0 fixes by providing explicit guidance and validation for the Generator component pattern.
182+
183+ ** Pattern Clarity** : The distinction between "toolkit Generator" (project files) and "domain application Generator" (business content) is now explicitly documented and automatically validated.
184+
185+ ---
186+
12187## [ 0.9.0] - 2025-11-17
13188
14189### 🎯 ` /metaspec.sdd.specify ` Command Enhancement
0 commit comments