@@ -656,10 +656,15 @@ cd my-speckit
656656/metaspec.sds.clarify # Clarify ambiguities (recommended)
657657/metaspec.sds.checklist # Quality check (recommended)
658658
659- # Phase 2: Design toolkit
659+ # Phase 2: Develop toolkit (complete workflow)
660660/metaspec.sdd.constitution # Define toolkit principles
661661/metaspec.sdd.specify "Define parser and validator" # Toolkit spec
662- /metaspec.sdd.plan # Architecture design
662+ /metaspec.sdd.clarify # Clarify technical decisions (recommended)
663+ /metaspec.sdd.plan # Plan architecture
664+ /metaspec.sdd.checklist # Validate requirements (recommended)
665+ /metaspec.sdd.tasks # Break down implementation
666+ /metaspec.sdd.analyze # Check architecture consistency (recommended)
667+ /metaspec.sdd.implement # Write code
663668```
664669
665670** Example 1b: Complex Specification (Needs Splitting)**
@@ -675,10 +680,15 @@ cd my-speckit
675680/metaspec.sds.analyze # Check task consistency (BEFORE implement)
676681/metaspec.sds.implement # Write sub-specification documents (NOT code)
677682
678- # Phase 2: Design toolkit (same as simple path )
683+ # Phase 2: Develop toolkit (complete workflow, same as Example 1 )
679684/metaspec.sdd.constitution
680685/metaspec.sdd.specify " Define parser and validator"
686+ /metaspec.sdd.clarify
681687/metaspec.sdd.plan
688+ /metaspec.sdd.checklist
689+ /metaspec.sdd.tasks
690+ /metaspec.sdd.analyze
691+ /metaspec.sdd.implement
682692```
683693
684694** Example 2: Iterating on specification**
0 commit comments