Skip to content

2.1 Presentation - List of Issues #4

@kitchenprinzessin3880

Description

@kitchenprinzessin3880
  • An ontology MUST be published online in both human- and machine-readable formats --> suggest rewriting the requirement from consumer point of view, e.g., An ontology MUST be accessible/retrievable online...
  • mcahine-readable format --> typo
  • 2.1.2 An ontology MUST be available online - resolvable .. --> here we may consider PID provider practice, e.g., resolve to a human readable page which contain links to access the vocabulary.= (in rdf)
  • An ontology MUST accord with the publication guidelines of both the Austrlaian Government in general and with the publication guidelines of the publishing organisation - can you please specify the AU gov guidelines? Austrlaian --> typo
  • 2.1.1 - The AGLWD will not test for this requirment directly -->(actually we can test it if the vocabulary identified with PID).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions