Skip to content

Review initial shapes and instance data using shapes #42

@Simo-climb

Description

@Simo-climb

@nicholascar

Things are in a bit of a flux and I need to clean up the folder structure and correctly position shapes under the profiles.... but as it stands the shapes is here https://github.com/AGLDWG/phs-ont/tree/profiles-validators/vocabularies/shapes

I'm in the process of promoting shapes up from a set of working "candidate" shapes and adding direct shacl as needs, asreview @F3RR3T work through the process of creating instance data. This is ironing out a few modelling gaps or alignments along the way.

The intended "final" shapes file is here https://github.com/AGLDWG/phs-ont/blob/profiles-validators/vocabularies/shapes/phs_shapes.shapes.ttl

It imports the working shapes which are contain some topbraid auto converted shapes derived from the phs.ttl owl statements.

As we work through generating representative instance data, we've been importing the various vocab graphs into this shapes graph and checking that the shapes are correct.

There is a set of work in progress initial instance data here https://github.com/AGLDWG/phs-ont/blob/profiles-validators/instance-data/instance_data_using_shacl.ttl

So the upshot is:

  • in the working shapes graphs 'most' shapes exist
  • but not all these working shapes have been pushed across to the "final" shapes as we haven't bottomed out the review as we create instance data;
  • not all vocabs have been imported yet - we are dong this as we bottom out the review of things;
  • the instance data is incomplete and we've only just started bottoming it out through the model.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions