Landing Page Integration for InPactAI #67
Conversation
…anaged by Supabase Auth)
…se Auth handles authentication)
WalkthroughThe changes remove all handling and storage of password hashes from the backend codebase. This includes eliminating the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @Saahi30, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. The pull request description states the intent is to integrate a standalone landing page into the main repository, placing it in a new LandingPage/ directory. However, the actual code changes included in the patches focus entirely on the backend, specifically removing password handling from the user model, schema, and database seeding logic. This suggests a shift towards using an external authentication service, likely Supabase as hinted by a code comment. Therefore, while the stated goal is landing page integration, the implemented changes are related to backend user authentication.
Highlights
- Backend Authentication Update: The primary change in this PR is the removal of password handling fields and logic from the backend's user management components, including the database model, Pydantic schema, and seeding script.
- External Authentication Shift: The removal of password management from the backend code strongly implies that user authentication is being delegated to an external service, with a code comment specifically mentioning Supabase Auth.
Changelog
- Backend/app/db/seed.py
- Removed 'password' key from user data dictionaries used for seeding.
- Removed the assignment of
password_hashfrom the seed data during user creation.
- Backend/app/models/models.py
- Removed the
password_hashcolumn definition from theUserSQLAlchemy model.
- Removed the
- Backend/app/routes/post.py
- Removed the
password_hashkey from the dictionary used when creating a new user object.
- Removed the
- Backend/app/schemas/schema.py
- Commented out the
password_hashfield in theUserCreatePydantic schema. - Added a comment indicating that password handling is managed by Supabase Auth.
- Commented out the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request aims to integrate the landing page into the main repository, which is a good step towards centralizing the project. The changes involve removing password-related fields from the user model and database seeding, likely to align with Supabase Auth. Overall, the changes seem reasonable, but let's review the specifics.
Summary of Findings
- Password Hash Removal: The password_hash field was removed from the User model, schema, and database seeding process. This aligns with the decision to use Supabase Auth for user authentication.
- Database Seeding: The database seeding process was modified to exclude password information. Consider adding error handling and more descriptive comments to improve robustness and clarity.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is moving in the right direction by integrating Supabase Auth and removing password management from the backend. However, consider adding the suggested improvements, particularly around error handling and comments, before merging. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
| id=user_data["id"], | ||
| username=user_data["username"], | ||
| email=user_data["email"], | ||
| password_hash=user_data[ | ||
| "password" | ||
| ], # Using plain password directly | ||
| role=user_data["role"], | ||
| bio=user_data["bio"], | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since you're removing the password, it might be worth adding a comment here explaining why these users don't have passwords. This will help future developers understand the context.
| id=user_data["id"], | |
| username=user_data["username"], | |
| email=user_data["email"], | |
| password_hash=user_data[ | |
| "password" | |
| ], # Using plain password directly | |
| role=user_data["role"], | |
| bio=user_data["bio"], | |
| ) | |
| id=user_data["id"], | |
| username=user_data["username"], | |
| email=user_data["email"], | |
| role=user_data["role"], | |
| bio=user_data["bio"], # Password managed by Supabase Auth |
| id=user_data["id"], | ||
| username=user_data["username"], | ||
| email=user_data["email"], | ||
| password_hash=user_data[ | ||
| "password" | ||
| ], # Using plain password directly | ||
| role=user_data["role"], | ||
| bio=user_data["bio"], | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a try-except block around the user creation and seeding process to catch any potential exceptions during database operations. This will improve the robustness of the seeding process.
try:
user = User(
id=user_data["id"],
username=user_data["username"],
email=user_data["email"],
role=user_data["role"],
bio=user_data["bio"],
)
session.add(user)
print(f"Created user: {user_data['email']}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error creating user {user_data['email']}: {e}")
await session.rollback() # Rollback in case of error![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Backend/app/db/seed.py(0 hunks)Backend/app/models/models.py(0 hunks)Backend/app/routes/post.py(0 hunks)Backend/app/schemas/schema.py(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- Backend/app/db/seed.py
- Backend/app/routes/post.py
- Backend/app/models/models.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Backend/app/schemas/schema.py (1)
8-8: Major inconsistency: PR objectives don't match the actual changes.The PR objectives describe integrating a landing page, but the actual changes remove password hash handling from the backend. This suggests either the wrong code changes or incorrect PR description.
Please clarify whether this PR should contain landing page integration changes or password hash removal changes, as these are completely different objectives.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if this PR contains landing page files or only backend authentication changes # Expected: Should find either LandingPage directory files or only backend auth-related changes echo "Checking for LandingPage directory and files:" fd -t d "LandingPage" . echo -e "\nChecking for landing page related files:" fd -e html -e css -e js -e jsx -e vue -e ts -e tsx . | head -10 echo -e "\nChecking for authentication/password related changes:" rg -l "password|auth|supabase" --type py echo -e "\nChecking recent git changes:" git log --oneline -10Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| username: str | ||
| email: str | ||
| password_hash: str | ||
| # password_hash: str # Removed: managed by Supabase Auth |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify consistent removal of password handling across the codebase.
The architectural decision to delegate authentication to Supabase Auth is sound, and the implementation approach of commenting out the field with a clear explanation is good practice. However, ensure this breaking change is handled consistently across all related code.
Run the following script to verify that password hash handling has been consistently removed:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that password_hash references have been consistently removed or updated
# Expected: Should find no active password_hash usage in user creation/management code
echo "Checking for remaining password_hash references in active code:"
rg "password_hash" --type py -A 2 -B 2
echo -e "\nChecking user creation endpoints for password handling:"
rg -A 10 -B 5 "UserCreate|user.*create" Backend/app/routes/
echo -e "\nChecking database models for password fields:"
rg -A 5 -B 5 "password" Backend/app/models/
echo -e "\nChecking if Supabase Auth integration is properly implemented:"
rg -A 5 "supabase.*auth|auth.*supabase" Backend/app/Length of output: 2857
Let’s verify that the Supabase Auth client is actually being initialized and that any auth methods (e.g. sign-up/sign-in) are in use:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Supabase client initialization
echo "Locating Supabase client instantiation:"
rg -n "create_client" -A2 -B2 Backend/app/
echo -e "\nChecking for any supabase.auth API usage (sign_up, sign_in, user):"
rg -nE "supabase\.auth\.(sign_(up|in)|user)" -A2 -B2 Backend/app/Length of output: 999
Ensure Supabase Auth sign-up/sign-in is actually invoked
While password_hash has been removed consistently, I didn’t find any calls to the Supabase Auth API (e.g. supabase.auth.sign_up, sign_in, or fetching supabase.auth.user)—only direct inserts into the users table. Without invoking Supabase Auth methods, users won’t be registered or authenticated correctly.
• Backend/app/routes/post.py – Supabase client is initialized at line 25 (create_client), but no supabase.auth.* calls follow.
• No occurrences of supabase.auth.sign_up or supabase.auth.sign_in in the codebase.
Please implement or verify that your user registration and login flows call the appropriate Supabase Auth methods instead of only performing DB inserts.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In Backend/app/schemas/schema.py at line 8, the password_hash field has been
removed as authentication is delegated to Supabase Auth. However, across the
codebase, especially in Backend/app/routes/post.py around line 25 where the
Supabase client is initialized, you need to replace direct database inserts for
user creation and login with calls to Supabase Auth methods such as
supabase.auth.sign_up and supabase.auth.sign_in. Review and update the user
registration and login flows to invoke these Supabase Auth APIs to ensure proper
user authentication and registration instead of only inserting users directly
into the database.
1 participant
📝 Description
This pull request integrates the standalone landing page into the main InPactAI repository. The landing page will serve as the public-facing entry point for the project until the full deployment is complete. This integration ensures that the landing page is version-controlled alongside the rest of the project and can be easily deployed or updated as needed.
🔧 Changes Made
LandingPage/directory within the main repository.🚀 How to Run the Landing Page Locally
LandingPagedirectory:cd LandingPage🤝 Collaboration
Credit to @ishaanxgupta (Ishaan Gupta) for the original landing page implementation.
✅ Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit