Skip to content

[Sync] 8.2.0 main to develop#1141

Merged
arun-s-aot merged 11 commits intoAOT-Technologies:developfrom
arun-s-aot:sync/8.2.0-main-to-develop
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

[Sync] 8.2.0 main to develop#1141
arun-s-aot merged 11 commits intoAOT-Technologies:developfrom
arun-s-aot:sync/8.2.0-main-to-develop

Conversation

@arun-s-aot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@arun-s-aot arun-s-aot commented Mar 4, 2026

📝 Pull Request Summary

Description:

Related Jira Ticket:

Type of Change:

  • ✨ Feature
  • 🐞 Bug Fix
  • ♻️ Refactor
  • 🧹 Code Cleanup
  • 🧪 Test Addition / Update
  • 📦 Dependency Update
  • 📘 Documentation Update
  • 🚀 Deployment / Config / Security Updates

🧩 Microfrontends Affected

Please select all microfrontends or modules that are part of this change:

  • forms-flow-admin
  • forms-flow-components
  • forms-flow-integration
  • forms-flow-nav
  • forms-flow-review
  • forms-flow-service
  • forms-flow-submissions
  • forms-flow-theme
  • scripts
  • Others (please specify below)

Details (if Others selected):


🧠 Summary of Changes


🧪 Testing Details

Testing Performed:

Screenshots (if applicable):


✅ Checklist

  • Code builds successfully without lint or type errors
  • Unit tests added or updated
  • Integration or end-to-end tests validated
  • UI verified
  • Documentation updated (README / Confluence / UI Docs)
  • No sensitive information (keys, passwords, secrets) committed
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG with relevant details
  • I have given a clear and meaningful PR title and description
  • I have verified cross-repo dependencies (if any)
  • I have confirmed backward compatibility with previous releases
  • Verified changes across all selected microfrontends

👥 Reviewer Notes

@arun-s-aot arun-s-aot requested review from a team as code owners March 4, 2026 09:47
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 4, 2026

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Release Tag

The VERSION file now appears to contain both the new and the previous version values. Confirm whether the release tooling expects a single version string, and ensure the file format matches what CI/CD and deployment scripts parse.

v8.2.0-alpha
Version Sync

Multiple microfrontend package.json files were bumped to 8.2.0-alpha. Validate that all relevant packages that participate in the build/release are updated consistently (including any root/workspace metadata if applicable) to avoid mismatched artifact versions.

"version": "8.2.0-alpha",
Semver Format

Confirm the 8.2.0-alpha pre-release tag format is compatible with your publishing and deployment process (e.g., npm dist-tags, Docker image tags, and any version comparison logic), especially if automation previously relied on 8.1.0-alpha.

"version": "8.2.0-alpha",

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2026

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
Possible issue
Remove duplicate old version line

Remove the leftover previous version line so the VERSION file contains a single
authoritative version value. Keeping multiple versions in this file can break
tooling that expects a single-line version string.

VERSION [1-2]

 v8.2.0-alpha
-v8.1.0-alpha
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

__

Why: The VERSION file in the new hunk contains both v8.2.0-alpha and the previous v8.1.0-alpha, which can break consumers that expect a single version string. Removing the leftover line makes the version source unambiguous and consistent with the bumped package.json versions.

Medium

@arun-s-aot arun-s-aot merged commit 003e6e4 into AOT-Technologies:develop Mar 4, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants