You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
apply_blend() function gets called always that a mask is present. I think this is OK for models that are not conditioned by concatenation with extra signals or where the unet number of channels is 4 (case of stable diffusion).
However, for models that condition the latents with the masked image latents + mask: why do we need to blend denoised latents with original latents? Isn't this already happening somehow thanks to the conditioning?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
apply_blend()
function gets called always that a mask is present. I think this is OK for models that are not conditioned by concatenation with extra signals or where the unet number of channels is 4 (case of stable diffusion).However, for models that condition the latents with the masked image latents + mask: why do we need to blend denoised latents with original latents? Isn't this already happening somehow thanks to the conditioning?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions