Gamechanger on the legal side of NAI leaks including their Hypernetworks and VAE (SD 1.5) ?!

[cmp-nct]

I took the time and read through the CompVis license text due to the SD 1.5 "leak" and the legal fallout.

The 1.5 model is built on base of the 1.2 model which is built on 1.1, it is a continued training which means the license is unchanged.
Any weights connected to it, any networks bound to it are covered by the license as well (VAE, hypernetworks etc)
The license: https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-license
"Distribution and Redistribution: You may host for Third Party remote access purposes (e.g. software-as-a-service), reproduce and distribute copies of the Model or Derivatives of the Model thereof in any medium, with or without modifications"
"Grant of Copyright License: Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare, publicly display, publicly perform,
sublicense, and distribute the Complementary Material, the Model, and Derivatives of the Model."
"Derivatives of the Model: means all modifications to the Model, works based on the Model, or any other model which is created or initialized by transfer of patterns of the weights, parameters, activations or output of the Model, to the other model, in order to cause the other model to perform similarly to the Model, including - but not limited to - distillation methods entailing the use of intermediate data representations or methods based on the generation of synthetic data by the Model for training the other model

So as read this the NAI leak is not a leak, except for source code that was NOT based on open source projects.
The model, the VAE, the hypernetworks .. all of that is based on SD so everyone has a copyright to it.

It's a serious part of the license, it basically means that anything people do with the model, no matter how complex and advanced and expensive that is .. the person or company automatically is giving everyone full copyright to it.
He has no obligation to provide the files but if anyone does .. he has every right to do so.

Any legal experts here who find a flaw in that ?