Replies: 2 comments
-
It will skip the current image in a batch, useful if you have live preview on |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Nearly every time I want to "SKIP" it is because I see the preview isn't
going in the right direction and I want to SKIP this attempt. I then just
generate again or tweak something and generate again without leaving behind
a trail of garbage. But, yes, when I read the tool tip I now see that it
does say it will save the image I don't want.
I find it odd that this is the prefered behavior. Perhaps:
1. SKIP # Just skip and go onto the next in batch
2. SAVE & SKIP # What it does now
3. SAVE & Continue # Allows to later offline examine images at
different steps
4. Abort Batch # Same as Interrupt along I think it shouldn't save
because you can click 2 and then 4 if you want a copy.
…On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:26 PM ClashSAN ***@***.***> wrote:
It will skip the current image in a batch, useful if you have live preview
on
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3392 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A3YFZACLWWCBHZB5S4Q7VYTWENNGXANCNFSM6AAAAAARLVED5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
<AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/repo-discussions/3392/comments/3938296
@github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Does "Skip" currently work?
I thought it was supposed to be the same as Interrupt without saving the image?
New github account just created moments ago.
Perhaps I could fix this? I see nothing in the code to skip save_image() in the code for Skip.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions