Replies: 8 comments 27 replies
-
|
Auto can't rest for a week without people ready to jump ship.. It's not the first time, let the guy get some rest. Also, contributions from the community still need to be reviewed before merging. That's work. edit: no wonder your name seemed familiar lol #4591 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I would think about this like this: I didn't pay for anything. I'm not in board meeting of some company. I or anyone can wish for things related to this project, but that ain't going to create an obligation or force anyone in control of this project to do anything for this project. And that is the way it should be. You are right that it may not be the best idea for this project to be gatekeeped by a single person, but then again this is HIS/HER project. Options are - wait calmly and enjoy the tool as it is, or get organized and do something similar yourself. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What you say would make sense if the code was made by that person. Then it would be YOUR project exclusively. But, you don't seem to consider that much of the code and functionality of this platform was contributed by the community, not Auto1111. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You simply can't or don't bother to read what I wrote. This project IS HIS/HER project. Not yours or someone else's. Others chose to take part in this project. That doesn't make it their project either. Too bad. Deal with it. Or fork the project. So "do it yourself" answer is cliche? Sounds more like you simply didn't read what I wrote or can't get my point. You or contributors are not entitled to anything. "Not fair" - how? What makes you say that? Do this project or its author owe you something, because you can't feel warm and fuzzy? Contributors had possibility to evaluate the project before doing anything - you don't have to use this piece of software either. You sound like things should be decided based on some mob or hive mentality. Shivers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You're being downright aggressive. I don't know why you take it so hard when someone starts a discussion that is ultimately intended to be a positive improvement for the community. I don't know who hurt you, but I won't read any further to find out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You simply don't get it. You feel entitled. You simply skip the parts you don't like in my reasoning and now you are already attacking my character? How classy - typical entitled snowflake tactics (see, this is a character attack). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure why people are jumping on this guy... he has valid points. With the current level of activity it may be "too much" for one person. Burnout is a real thing. Cracking the whip at Auto isn't the answer. He doesn't "owe" anyone anything. Having more than one person with commit rights could be good for the project. Give Auto a break for goodness sakes! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This. I don't think it's that hard to understand. The activity of thousands cannot depend on the time of a single person, this no longer makes any sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In such a case, it may be worthwhile if some people within the community (including you) could come to an agreement about creating an updated fork. That could be used until Automatic1111 is back to merge the changes. However, I presume this is not something most people would consider for the time being. As a break of 1 - 2 weeks isn't critical for this project yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Exactly. This space is moving way quicker than 1 dev can handle. He needs to give access to a few other senior\seasoned devs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
There are other projects people can join and help, and nothing prevents from forking this project? But who is up to it? It is easy to speculate and ask something from others who don't owe you a thing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes burnout can be a real thing here. Automatic1111 deserves credit for having worked on this project for so many months in a row, fully free of charge for everyone. What I personally appreciate is that he also takes his break at a point where the project has become more stable (e.g. compared to some changes mid-January). Where I'm also grateful that he considered my own pull requests for two of the issues, and then cared to implement it himself in a better manner. All in all stable social circles matter. The best and most helpful thing would be really how Automatic1111 can be supported. Like let's say, would he take additional maintainers? More testers for pull requests? People who help him implement things that he personally wants to see in the UI? These are all points that are more likely to bring his interest back. But of course I also understand your frustration AbyszOne. Because since of the release of ControlNet extensions, the speed of Stable Diffusion innovation has kind of skyrocketed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think it would be enough for there to be at least one person capable of reviewing the project once a day. It is not even a demanding requirement, which is why I am concerned that stability at this point will continue to depend on how many vacation days a person wants to take. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, I give it 2 more weeks before extension creators get pissed off enough that someone forks this, and the extension creators jump ship and move to the new fork, abandoning this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
hysteric |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🤨Uh? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Found the intern. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yeah, I've noticed this. 2 months ago you had commits literally every hour. Now, 1 commit every week. the tech is moving too fast for 1 guy to have his claws on the most popular tool in this space. We need an alternative or he needs to give access to this repo to other senior\seasoned devs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
And it would be enough to know that there is someone who can manage at least the general details if the leader is not behind the wheel. It really is worrying that people get childishly angry for saying something of simple common sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Autoxanders empire could be fractured into multiple competing forks and split into the different camps with different maintainers. But wouldn't that have already happened if someone else was just as capable? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I agree that this is a serious issue. Honestly, while I appreciate Auto's efforts in maintaining this repo, I think it would be helpful if he allowed others to help with the work. It's difficult for one person to keep up with a repo of this size, and it's possible that he may not even remember how some of the code works, given that it was written by other contributors. Moreover, I think this repo is somewhat messy for an open-source project. There aren't any clear priorities or tasks for potential contributors, making it hard to know where to start. With almost 1500 issues, it's tough to see which ones have been addressed in recent releases. It's simply not feasible for one person to fix all these problems, which is why I believe having more people maintain this repo is crucial. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
For people who talk about "common sense.": Common sense is: If you don't like how this repo works, Fork it and add/merge the PRs.. you have access to everything... Stop complaining and work for what you want, stop asking for someone else to do the job for you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am not demanding anything, I am opening a debate to analyze an existing problem. I thought this was the discussion section. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
There is no problem here, you are creating a problem according to your needs. Auto will manage his repo as it pleases, updating 5 times a minute or once a year. If you want something done, fork it, merge whatever u want, Do it yourself!
It is not, is called reality... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
🤨. Ok. Kid like enough. Have a nice day. 🖐️ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
see ya..! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Auto1111 was always the most up-to-date gui with dizzying changes, but lately several days go by without accepting fix updates and improvements that are highly relevant and hinder the work of users. Changes that are contributed voluntarily by the community.
Is this trend an indication that this gui needs a change of direction or alternative?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions