Skip to content

Commit 11fedea

Browse files
authored
Merge pull request #1823 from sideeffects/sendupstream_tscnotes20240520
TSC Meeting Notes.
2 parents 64a788c + 431995d commit 11fedea

File tree

1 file changed

+72
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+72
-0
lines changed

tsc/meetings/2024-05-21.md

Lines changed: 72 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
1+
Minutes from OpenVDB TSC meeting, May 21st, 2024
2+
3+
Attendees: *Jeff* L., *Andre* P, *Dan* B., *Greg* H., *Rich* J, *Ken*
4+
M..
5+
6+
Additional Attendees:
7+
Rabih, Matthew Cong (NVidia), Jonathan Swartz, Francis Williams.
8+
9+
Regrets: *Nick* A.
10+
11+
Agenda:
12+
13+
1) Confirm quorum
14+
2) Secretary
15+
3) TAC Update
16+
4) PR 1807 & CI Updates
17+
5) fVDB Updates
18+
6) Next meeting
19+
20+
------------
21+
22+
1) Confirm quorum
23+
24+
Quorum is present.
25+
26+
2) Secretary
27+
28+
Secretary is Jeff Lait.
29+
30+
3) TAC Update
31+
32+
Proposed NanoBind and asked for GPUs on CI runners
33+
34+
Apparently we already have a service for GPUs, which is paid for, but
35+
the ASWF seems fine with that. Apparently used by ColorIO, so we can
36+
ask them for advice. We might want to avoid using GPU machines for
37+
the build? But that would require build artifacts. There is some
38+
experience at NVidia splitting the GPU and CPU CI tests. Ken will get
39+
instructions on how to run on at all, that we'll test with fVDB first.
40+
41+
There is a CI slack channel we can go to for more aid as well.
42+
43+
NanoBind was presented to the TAC as well. Positive feedback. They
44+
seem okay with us using it moving forward. It is also suggested other
45+
projects will move to Nanobind.
46+
47+
Nanobind does not provide an interpreter, but can be called from a
48+
host's own interpreter.
49+
50+
4) PR 1807 & CI Updates
51+
52+
Mac runner has to update to latest version.
53+
54+
Cuda compiler is failing with 11.5. This is Oct 2021, so we should
55+
drop support? Matthew Cong will take a look at it.
56+
57+
Missing Changelist, which Andre will provide.
58+
59+
5) fVDB updates
60+
61+
Who should review this? Do we avoid NVidia-centered review? So long
62+
as it is supported and git hub issues are supported not much concern.
63+
64+
The TSC members are needed to sign off, but do not have to be the
65+
"actual" reviewers. These can be reviewed by non-TSC members, and TSC
66+
members can approve the reviews.
67+
68+
Initial version should be 0.X as API can change.
69+
70+
6) Next meeting
71+
72+
Next meeting is on May 28th, 2024. 2pm-3pm EDT (GMT-4)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)