|
| 1 | +Minutes from 93rd OpenVDB TSC meeting, June 1st, 2021, (EDT) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Attendees: *Nick* A., *Jeff* L., *Dan* B., *Andre* P. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Additional Attendees: JT Nelson (Blender), Richard Jones (DNeg), |
| 6 | +Johannes Meng (Intel) |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Regrets: *Ken* M. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Agenda: |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +1) Confirm Quorum |
| 13 | +2) Secretary |
| 14 | +3) Context functions in VDB AX |
| 15 | +4) VDB Vector Merge |
| 16 | +5) VDB 8.1.0 |
| 17 | +6) Feedback from Larry |
| 18 | +7) Siggraph Course |
| 19 | +8) Next meeting |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +1) Confirm Quorum |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +Quorum is present. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +2) Secretary |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +Secretary is Dan Bailey. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +3) Context functions in VDB AX |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +Nick presented some options for introducing "context functions". The backend is |
| 33 | +working in AX, but the syntax has not yet been agreed upon. There are issues |
| 34 | +with using free functions related to type inference in particular. For example, |
| 35 | +"@density = volumesample()" needs to know the type of the volume being sampled. |
| 36 | +Jeff mentions that VEX has support for return type overloads such as with the |
| 37 | +point() function, however a specific choice was made to use volumesample and |
| 38 | +volumesamplev to avoid the challenge of trying to infer the type in a nested |
| 39 | +expression. An example of this is 5.0 * noise(...) - it's not clear if this is |
| 40 | +intended to be 1D or 3D noise. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +Nick wants the user to be able to select the context for two reasons. One to be |
| 43 | +able to seamlessly transfer code from one context with another without having to |
| 44 | +rewrite the snippet and two to be to use multi-context snippets, such as |
| 45 | +sampling a volume onto a point attribute. Jeff highly values the first point. |
| 46 | +Additional contexts being considered are a "metadata" context and a "generic" |
| 47 | +context. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Various options were discussed, and the leading candidate came out to be this |
| 50 | +one: |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +volume::@density->sample() |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +With the ability to assume default context by dropping the "namespace": |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +@density->sample() |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +One additional complexity is being able to retrieve the transform from the |
| 59 | +volume associated with a point attribute, Rich gave this example: |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +volume::pt@density->transform() |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +Not ideal, but ideally would like the user not to need to know the name of the |
| 64 | +point grid to access the transform. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +Nick and Rich to look into issues related to this discussion and come back with |
| 67 | +a more concrete proposal. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +4) VDB Vector Merge |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Proposal to rename this SOP to 'VDB Vector from Scalar' to avoid confusion with |
| 72 | +the VDB Merge SOP which performs a very different operation. Will change just |
| 73 | +the label name and not the operator type name. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +Possibility to also rename 'VDB Vector Split' to 'VDB Scalar from Vector', but |
| 76 | +this has the added confusion of sounding like it might compute the length of a |
| 77 | +vector rather than splitting out each component. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +Decision was to go ahead with the 'VDB Vector Merge' -> 'VDB Vector from Scalar' |
| 80 | +rename and leave the 'VDB Vector Split'. Jeff has made the change in Houdini. No |
| 81 | +change to the core library so not deemed urgent to rush it into the 8.1.0 |
| 82 | +release. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +5) VDB 8.1.0 |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +A few minor fixes to be introduced to the release candidate. Nick to merge |
| 87 | +master into this branch. Otherwise, VDB 8.1.0 is ready for release. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +6) Feedback from Larry |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Which version of VDB was the feature/nanovdb branched from? Decision was to try |
| 92 | +and merge master into this feature branch on a more regular basis so that there |
| 93 | +are fewer differences between the two branches. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +Can OpenVDB be built against OpenEXR 3.0? Has not been tested currently. This |
| 96 | +will affect the core library (for Half) and the openvdb_render binary (for |
| 97 | +OpenEXR). Decision to test this and to update the embedded version of Half now |
| 98 | +that this version has been released. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +7) Siggraph Course |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +JT will have a draft edit ready by Wednesday morning, a few minor changes needed |
| 103 | +and the final slide. Submission deadline is Friday 4th June. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +Submission deadline for course notes is the following week - Friday 11th June. |
| 106 | +Course notes to be discussed in next weeks TSC meeting. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +8) Next meeting |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +Next meeting is June 8th, 2021. 12pm-1pm EST (GMT-5). |
0 commit comments