|
| 1 | +Minutes from 145th OpenVDB TSC meeting, September 6th, 2022, (EDT) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Attendees: *Ken* M., *Dan* B., *Rich* J. *Andre* P. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +Regrets: *Nick* A., *Jeff* L. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Additional Attendees: Peter Cheng (DW), Karl Marett, Sebastian Gaida, |
| 8 | +JT Nelson (Blender), Greg Hurst (United Therapeutics), Bruce Cherniak (Intel) |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Agenda: |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +1) Confirm quorum |
| 13 | +2) Secretary |
| 14 | +3) Forum and Discussion |
| 15 | + a) Request to expose 4x4 matrix in Python bindings |
| 16 | + b) Update build instruction |
| 17 | +4) Failure in NanoVDB CI |
| 18 | +5) VDB in medical imaging (OpenVDB Slack Channel) |
| 19 | +6) Mathematica Link Update |
| 20 | +7) Update from DreamWorks |
| 21 | +8) CI Effort |
| 22 | +9) Root Node Offset |
| 23 | +10) Next Meeting |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +-------------------- |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +1) Confirm quorum |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Quorum is present. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +2) Secretary |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Secretary is Andre Pradhana |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +3) Forum and Discussion |
| 36 | + a) Request to expose 4x4 matrix in Python bindings. |
| 37 | + This should be done through PyBind 11. A few people expressed an interest |
| 38 | + to help with this task. |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | + b) Update build instruction to reflect the correct version of TBB. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +4) Failure in NanoVDB CI |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +We look at failure NanoVDB CI failure in MacOS. Ken has an idea that it may |
| 45 | +be caused by the new allocation that is implemented. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +5) VDB in medical imaging (OpenVDB Slack Channel) |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Somebody was asking about the potential of using OpenVDB or NanoVDB for medical |
| 50 | +imaging purposes. The answer is: yes, VDB can be used for this purpose. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +6) Mathematica Link Update |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Greg is still waiting for a reply from Wolfram. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +7) Update from DreamWorks |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +DreamWorks said that they will go through with a more thorough investigation of |
| 59 | +existing old VDB files that uses the dense table in the root node. They will |
| 60 | +probably convert old VDB files to new VDBs. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +8) CI Effort |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Dan gives an update on the CI effort. We have an access to two machines provided |
| 65 | +by AWS. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +Dan claims that the billable hours for all CI to finish is 1 hr and 43 minutes. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +9) Root Node Offset |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Ken revisited his work on the root node offset. He did not find any performance |
| 72 | +issues with the new implementation. Several things to note: |
| 73 | +a) The way that Ken solves the problem is by adding a CoordT origin in |
| 74 | + the root node to offset the position of the children of the root node. |
| 75 | +b) The offset should coincide with the grand-child of the root. In a regular |
| 76 | + tree configuration the offset should be 2048 = 16 * 16 * 16 / 2. |
| 77 | +c) Ken proposed the origin offset on the root-node to be dynamic, because |
| 78 | + in the future, we can read an old VDB file with the root node origin |
| 79 | + set to be (0, 0, 0). |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +He proposed that we would go through with the ABI change, i.e. adding the |
| 82 | +origin member data in the root. He also proposed that in the future, doing |
| 83 | +operations on two or more different grids should be restricted on grids |
| 84 | +with the same origin. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +10) Next meeting |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Next meeting is on September 13th, 2022. 1pm-2pm EDT (GMT-4). |
0 commit comments