Hi, CEBRA team! Is that make sense to use original data not fitted by cebra model to calculate the Consistency across features? #115
Unanswered
qweasdf1354
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
hi @qweasdf1354 I am not sure exactly the issue and goal; you are asking how can you use consistency without training with cebra? The idea of consistency is to (1) be sure you get consistent results, which would imply a good model. So you should train the model the same way several times to measure this (see figure 1); (2) to use as a metric of differences across datasets (see Figure 6). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi @qweasdf1354 , any further question/follow up needed here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, author! I using the cebra for month and today i found use original data not fitted by cebra model to calculate the Consistency across features the results seems good for me and the fitted embedding seems have low consistency scores.
I use single train model by 2 continuous and 1 discrete variables, the maxiteration i set is 10000 which is not sufficient to get the good consistency results and embedding.
So, I set the maxiteration = 50000 now and batch_size=10240 which take me 25min to train a single model. It is still training now(total 54 model)
I want to know is that make sense to use original data not fitted by cebra model to calculate the Consistency across features?
Thanks a lot!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions