I've read both Cycle-CenterNet and LORE papers and noticed that LORE uses WTW dataset for training. However, in the experimental results section, why isn't there a direct comparison with Cycle-CenterNet's performance?
Is this because:
The results were not competitive enough to include?
There were different evaluation protocols?
Or other technical considerations?
It would be helpful to understand the rationale behind this omission, as a direct comparison could better demonstrate the relative strengths of these approaches. Any clarification would be appreciated!
I've read both Cycle-CenterNet and LORE papers and noticed that LORE uses WTW dataset for training. However, in the experimental results section, why isn't there a direct comparison with Cycle-CenterNet's performance?
Is this because:
The results were not competitive enough to include?
There were different evaluation protocols?
Or other technical considerations?
It would be helpful to understand the rationale behind this omission, as a direct comparison could better demonstrate the relative strengths of these approaches. Any clarification would be appreciated!