Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Is this any useful in practice? i.e., does any optimization require it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, Alive2 does not distinguish between +NaN and -NaN:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8TB3fv
I found that there are a few library functions in C that safely deals with the sign of NaN:
Z3 does not seem to support signed NaNs (maybe all SMT solvers don't?); would there be an efficient way to implement them in Alive2?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions