You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first of all, I want to say that this project looks extremely interesting.
The feature set is impressive, especially for advanced Windows streaming setups with HDR, virtual displays, audio enhancements, and the broader Sunshine/Moonlight ecosystem around it.
Because of that, I think there could be real interest from users outside China as well.
However, there are currently two major points that make adoption difficult for people like me:
English translation / international accessibility
At the moment, a large part of the project presentation is still difficult for non-Chinese users to follow.
I would like to ask:
Is there a roadmap or timeline for the English translation?
Will only the most important setup instructions be translated, or is the goal to gradually move the full GitHub presence to English as well?
Does that include the README, release notes, documentation, feature explanations, and issue/support guidance?
For broader international adoption, this would make a big difference.
VirusTotal / Defender detections
The second issue is currently a much bigger blocker for me.
I checked the public VirusTotal report for the current build hash:
Together with the Windows Defender / browser warnings reported, this is currently a show stopper for testing the portable build on a primary Windows machine.
So I would like to ask:
Are these detections currently being investigated?
Are there plans to improve trust and verification for released binaries?
For example: code signing, reproducible builds, published build instructions, checksums, or other verification methods?
To be clear: I am not making an accusation here.
I am only saying that from an outside user perspective, these warnings currently create a major trust barrier.
Why I am asking
I am asking because the project genuinely looks very promising, and I think it could attract much more attention internationally.
But for that to happen, two things seem especially important:
clearer and more complete English documentation
stronger trust signals around the released binaries
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
first of all, I want to say that this project looks extremely interesting.
The feature set is impressive, especially for advanced Windows streaming setups with HDR, virtual displays, audio enhancements, and the broader Sunshine/Moonlight ecosystem around it.
Because of that, I think there could be real interest from users outside China as well.
However, there are currently two major points that make adoption difficult for people like me:
At the moment, a large part of the project presentation is still difficult for non-Chinese users to follow.
I would like to ask:
Is there a roadmap or timeline for the English translation?
Will only the most important setup instructions be translated, or is the goal to gradually move the full GitHub presence to English as well?
Does that include the README, release notes, documentation, feature explanations, and issue/support guidance?
For broader international adoption, this would make a big difference.
The second issue is currently a much bigger blocker for me.
I checked the public VirusTotal report for the current build hash:
ae4ed5a7ce86bdf16a07131633e17f371d01efc35f1e4bbf46ca7557e70e8e1d
Together with the Windows Defender / browser warnings reported, this is currently a show stopper for testing the portable build on a primary Windows machine.
So I would like to ask:
Are these detections currently being investigated?
Are there plans to improve trust and verification for released binaries?
For example: code signing, reproducible builds, published build instructions, checksums, or other verification methods?
To be clear: I am not making an accusation here.
I am only saying that from an outside user perspective, these warnings currently create a major trust barrier.
Why I am asking
I am asking because the project genuinely looks very promising, and I think it could attract much more attention internationally.
But for that to happen, two things seem especially important:
clearer and more complete English documentation
stronger trust signals around the released binaries
Best regards from germany :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions