kernel/umh.c: fix some spelling mistakes

Fix some spelling mistakes, and modify the order of the parameter comments
to be consistent with the order of the parameters passed to the function.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: zhouchuangao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Author: zhouchuangao

kernel/umh.c

@@ -338,8 +338,8 @@ static void helper_unlock(void)
  * @argv: arg vector for process
  * @envp: environment for process
  * @gfp_mask: gfp mask for memory allocation
- * @cleanup: a cleanup function
  * @init: an init function
+ * @cleanup: a cleanup function
  * @data: arbitrary context sensitive data
  *
  * Returns either %NULL on allocation failure, or a subprocess_info
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static void helper_unlock(void)
  * exec.  A non-zero return code causes the process to error out, exit,
  * and return the failure to the calling process
  *
- * The cleanup function is just before ethe subprocess_info is about to
+ * The cleanup function is just before the subprocess_info is about to
  * be freed.  This can be used for freeing the argv and envp.  The
  * Function must be runnable in either a process context or the
  * context in which call_usermodehelper_exec is called.
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_setup);
 
 /**
  * call_usermodehelper_exec - start a usermode application
- * @sub_info: information about the subprocessa
+ * @sub_info: information about the subprocess
  * @wait: wait for the application to finish and return status.
  *        when UMH_NO_WAIT don't wait at all, but you get no useful error back
  *        when the program couldn't be exec'ed. This makes it safe to call