|
1 | 1 | Postmortem |
2 | 2 | ========== |
3 | 3 |
|
4 | | -After the evaluation it is time to make a retrospective, and look what has |
5 | | -been achieved and what has not. |
6 | | - |
7 | | -On the introduction several objectives were mentioned, let's revisit those. |
8 | | - |
9 | | -* Research. Background research was conducted on fields covered by the |
10 | | -system. It was particularly interesting learning about the dataflow paradigm, |
11 | | -because it is a niche I was not familiar with. |
12 | | -It was also great looking at the available commercial solutions, they prove |
13 | | -that there is a lot of enterprise interests on this kind of systems. |
14 | | - |
15 | | -* Requirements. The bi-weekly iterations worked reasonably well, there was not |
16 | | -anything that got stuck or delayed more than one additional iteration. |
17 | | -It also proved useful for having a usable system from even the first iteration. |
18 | | - |
19 | | -* Design. The final implementation followed the initial sketches pretty |
20 | | -closely, proving the initial design had solid fundamentals, the good evaluation |
21 | | -score, and the remarks given by the users demonstrates that while there are |
22 | | -plenty of improvements that can be done it remains a good interface to use. |
23 | | - |
24 | | -* Implementation. At the end of the project the non-functional requirements |
25 | | -have been met, delivering a windows single executable file that participants |
26 | | -used for the evaluation, while keeping a good performance, handling many |
27 | | -blocks without a hitch, and keeping the frame rate steady while modifying |
28 | | -connections and running the execution of the pipeline simultaneously. |
29 | | - |
30 | | -* Testing. Probably the weakest part of the project because all the backend |
31 | | -is based around visual elements unit testing proved pretty useless, and this |
32 | | -part comprised the biggest part of the code. |
33 | | - |
34 | | -* Evaluation. Despite having a low number of participants the evaluation |
35 | | -resulted in a mostly unanimous good reviews of the software, as well as |
36 | | -providing very useful feedback for future improvements. |
37 | | - |
38 | | -* Learning. Because most of the milestones were achieved the final system has |
39 | | -proved to be useful enough for its use as a learning tool, it was even |
40 | | -remarked by two participants how easy it was to use, and how easy it was to do |
41 | | -complex actions (such as hyper-parameter tuning) compared to other |
42 | | -frameworks/libraries. |
43 | | - |
44 | | -* Faster exploratory work. I personally used the software for performing |
45 | | -ml analysis, finding it worked pretty well for early exploratory work, when |
46 | | -limited by the lack of a block it was pretty easy and fast adding a block |
47 | | -that solved the problem (in around ~20 lines of code). |
48 | | -During this use I realized another possible improvement, caching operations, |
49 | | -with this the results of pipelines are not recalculated unless something |
50 | | -changes upstream, this provides the closest thing to a visual REPL[^REPL]. |
51 | | - |
52 | | -All the major milestones were reached except the compilation feature, this is |
53 | | -because deciding the order in which blocks get translated means settling |
54 | | -the current evaluation strategy, while leaving undecided means that some |
55 | | -interesting such as optimistic evaluation can be implemented on the feature, |
56 | | -for more on this check the type chapters, two languages section. |
57 | | - |
58 | | -In conclusion Persimmon has achieved most of the settled objectives, proving |
| 4 | +After the evaluation it is time to make a retrospective, look what Persimmon |
| 5 | +has achieved. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Objectives Review |
| 9 | +----------------- |
| 10 | +<!-- |
| 11 | +Research: |
| 12 | +: Background research was conducted on fields covered by the |
| 13 | + system. It was particularly interesting learning about the dataflow paradigm, |
| 14 | + because it is a niche I was not familiar with. |
| 15 | + It was also great looking at the available commercial solutions, they prove |
| 16 | + that there is a lot of enterprise interests on this kind of systems. |
| 17 | +
|
| 18 | +Requirements: |
| 19 | +: The bi-weekly iterations worked reasonably well, there was not |
| 20 | + anything that got stuck or delayed more than one additional iteration. |
| 21 | + It also proved useful for having a usable system from even the first iteration. |
| 22 | +
|
| 23 | +Testing: |
| 24 | +: Probably the weakest part of the project because all the backend |
| 25 | + is based around visual elements unit testing proved pretty useless, and this |
| 26 | + part comprised the biggest part of the code. |
| 27 | +--> |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Feasibility: |
| 30 | +: Using evaluation it can be concluded that it is possible to create a |
| 31 | + machine learning visual interface that is as flexible as a language, |
| 32 | + including a type system and errors in compilation time, and yet remains |
| 33 | + simple to use, even for newcomers. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +Design and Usability: |
| 36 | +: The final implementation closely followed the initial sketches, proving the |
| 37 | + initial design had solid fundamentals. |
| 38 | + The good evaluation scores, and final remarks given by participants |
| 39 | + demonstrates that the interface has accomplished its objectives of |
| 40 | + producing a powerful yet simple to use interface. |
| 41 | + Features like the smart bubble that use instrospection to suggest suitable |
| 42 | + blocks to connect leverage the type system to help the user create the |
| 43 | + pipelines faster and easier. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +Evaluation: |
| 46 | +: Despite having a low number of participants the evaluation |
| 47 | + resulted in a mostly unanimous good reviews of the software, as well as |
| 48 | + providing very useful feedback for future improvements. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +Learning Tool: |
| 51 | +: Because most of the milestones were achieved the final system has |
| 52 | + proved to be useful enough for its use as a learning tool, it was even |
| 53 | + remarked by two participants how easy it was to use, and how easy it was to do |
| 54 | + complex actions (such as hyper-parameter tuning) compared to other |
| 55 | + frameworks/libraries. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +Faster Exploratory Work: |
| 58 | +: I personally used the software for performing |
| 59 | + ml analysis, finding it worked pretty well for early exploratory work, when |
| 60 | + limited by the lack of a block it was pretty easy and fast adding a block |
| 61 | + that solved the problem (in around ~20 lines of code). |
| 62 | + During this use I realized another possible improvement, caching operations, |
| 63 | + with this the results of pipelines are not recalculated unless something |
| 64 | + changes upstream, this provides the closest thing to a visual REPL[^REPL]. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | +Implementation: |
| 67 | +: At the end of the project the non-functional requirements have been met, |
| 68 | + delivering a windows single executable file that participants used for the |
| 69 | + evaluation, while keeping a good performance, handling many blocks without |
| 70 | + a hitch, and keeping the frame rate steady while modifying connections and |
| 71 | + running the execution of the pipeline simultaneously. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +Retrospective |
| 74 | +------------- |
| 75 | +With over 7k lines of code 10 releases, and more than 200 commits, Persimmon |
| 76 | +stands as a medium size codebase, since its inception it has gathered |
| 77 | +attention, with over 3000 visits, and more than 90 stars on [Github]. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +<!-- |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +--> |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +It has been featured on [multiple], [websites], and even won [best project] at |
| 84 | +the compshow 2017 at the University of Hertfordshire. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Conclusion |
| 89 | +---------- |
| 90 | +In conclusion Persimmon has achieved all proposed objectives, proving |
59 | 91 | there is room for improvement on the field of visual languages for machine |
60 | 92 | learning, and that small improvements make a significant impact on the user |
61 | 93 | experience. |
62 | | -Giving more power to the user should not mean making the interface more |
63 | | -complicated. |
| 94 | +In fact a system should not only make it hard or impossible to construct |
| 95 | +incorrect graphs, but should make it easier and faster to create correct graph. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +Giving more power to the user does not mean making the interface more |
| 98 | +complicated, in fact it can be the opposite. |
64 | 99 |
|
65 | 100 |
|
66 | 101 | Bibliography |
67 | 102 | ============ |
68 | 103 |
|
| 104 | +[Github]: htttps://github.com/AlvarBer/Persimmon |
| 105 | +[multiple]: http://mailchi.mp/pythonweekly/python-weekly-issue-295 |
| 106 | +[websites]: http://forum.ai100.com.cn/blog/thread/ml-2017-05-10/ |
| 107 | +[best project]: https://twitter.com/HertfordshireCS/status/857266574356598785 |
| 108 | + |
69 | 109 | [^REPL]: A Read Eval Print Loop is an interactive console many modern |
70 | 110 | programming languages that allows for the interactive execution of |
71 | 111 | expressions, saving the results in a local session. |
| 112 | + |
0 commit comments