[X86] Add -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter test coverage to the BITSCAN constexpr test files (llvm#156070)

Update tests to use builtin_test_helpers.h and the TEST_CONSTEXPR helper macro

Partial fix for llvm#155814

Author: RKSimon

clang/test/CodeGen/X86/bitscan-builtins.c

@@ -1,18 +1,25 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -ffreestanding %s -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -std=c++11 -ffreestanding %s -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
 
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -ffreestanding %s -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -std=c++11 -ffreestanding %s -triple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter | FileCheck %s
+
 // PR33722
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -ffreestanding %s -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -fms-extensions -fms-compatibility-version=19.00 -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -ffreestanding %s -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -fms-extensions -fms-compatibility-version=19.00 -no-enable-noundef-analysis -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
 
+
 #include <x86intrin.h>
+#include "builtin_test_helpers.h"
 
 int test_bit_scan_forward(int a) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test_bit_scan_forward
 // CHECK: %[[call:.*]] = call i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %{{.*}}, i1 true)
 // CHECK: ret i32 %[[call]]
   return _bit_scan_forward(a);
 }
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(_bit_scan_forward(0x00000001) ==  0);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(_bit_scan_forward(0x10000000) == 28);
 
 int test_bit_scan_reverse(int a) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test_bit_scan_reverse
@@ -21,25 +28,33 @@ int test_bit_scan_reverse(int a) {
 // CHECK: ret i32 %[[sub]]
   return _bit_scan_reverse(a);
 }
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(_bit_scan_reverse(0x00000001) ==  0);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(_bit_scan_reverse(0x01000000) == 24);
 
 int test__bsfd(int X) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test__bsfd
 // CHECK: %[[call:.*]] = call i32 @llvm.cttz.i32(i32 %{{.*}}, i1 true)
   return __bsfd(X);
 }
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsfd(0x00000008) ==  3);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsfd(0x00010008) ==  3);
 
 int test__bsfq(long long X) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test__bsfq
 // CHECK: %[[call:.*]] = call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64 %{{.*}}, i1 true)
   return __bsfq(X);
 }
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsfq(0x0000000800000000ULL) == 35);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsfq(0x0004000000000000ULL) == 50);
 
 int test__bsrd(int X) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test__bsrd
 // CHECK:  %[[call:.*]] = call i32 @llvm.ctlz.i32(i32 %{{.*}}, i1 true)
 // CHECK:  %[[sub:.*]] = sub nsw i32 31, %[[call]]
   return __bsrd(X);
 }
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsrd(0x00000010) ==  4);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsrd(0x00100100) == 20);
 
 int test__bsrq(long long X) {
 // CHECK-LABEL: test__bsrq
@@ -48,26 +63,5 @@ int test__bsrq(long long X) {
 // CHECK:  %[[sub:.*]] = sub nsw i32 63, %[[cast]]
   return __bsrq(X);
 }
-
-// Test constexpr handling.
-#if defined(__cplusplus) && (__cplusplus >= 201103L)
-
-char bsf_0[_bit_scan_forward(0x00000001) ==  0 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsf_1[_bit_scan_forward(0x10000000) == 28 ? 1 : -1];
-
-char bsr_0[_bit_scan_reverse(0x00000001) ==  0 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsr_1[_bit_scan_reverse(0x01000000) == 24 ? 1 : -1];
-
-char bsfd_0[__bsfd(0x00000008) ==  3 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsfd_1[__bsfd(0x00010008) ==  3 ? 1 : -1];
-
-char bsrd_0[__bsrd(0x00000010) ==  4 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsrd_1[__bsrd(0x00100100) == 20 ? 1 : -1];
-
-char bsfq_0[__bsfq(0x0000000800000000ULL) == 35 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsfq_1[__bsfq(0x0004000000000000ULL) == 50 ? 1 : -1];
-
-char bsrq_0[__bsrq(0x0000100800000000ULL) == 44 ? 1 : -1];
-char bsrq_1[__bsrq(0x0004000100000000ULL) == 50 ? 1 : -1];
-
-#endif
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsrq(0x0000100800000000ULL) == 44);
+TEST_CONSTEXPR(__bsrq(0x0004000100000000ULL) == 50);