Skip to content

Doesn't appear to use standard AWS API for access? #18

@boxabirds

Description

@boxabirds

Firstly thanks for this tool! It is really useful for debugging issues.

And also, I spent a big chunk of time hunting down what was in the end a simple typo in my code for the name of the primary index column. One of the problems that slightly exacerbated it was that the HTTP status code returned was 500 but under the hood it's actually 400. E.g.

Making API request
{
  status: 500,
  statusText: 'Internal Server Error',
  data: {
    status: false,
    exception: '{"message":"The provided key element does not match the schema","code":"ValidationException","time":"2019-12-22T00:18:40.455Z","requestId":"CRVC9347J1AGP60CB6818OPN6JVV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9AXXXXXX","statusCode":400,"retryable":false,"retryDelay":40.114206418810625}'
  }

Digging into the code a bit to see where this mapping was, I noticed this CLI utility, as helpful as it is, seems to refer to this independent AWS client. I'm confused because that repository does have headers that say copyright Amazon; I can only presume this is a fork?

The issue is I don't think the 400 code should be mapped to a 500 code as this loses important information and is hard to trace back to official AWS docs when the code has been changed.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions