Version 3.0.x and 2.6.x support timeline #6358
-
Hey there, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @mcaveety . I understand why there might be some confusion because the 2.6.x releases have a The reason is that Red Hat used to have a version format requirement for all projects. The format of the version needed to be
That formatting is no longer a requirement, so we (the Apicurio team) have dropped the As for support of 2.6.x vs. 3.0 - I cannot give you a specific timeline for when we would stop supporting 2.6.x, but please consider it deprecated. Red Hat's product (Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry) has support for 2.6 for another six months or so. That's probably the best timeline I can give you. That said, we have complete freedom in the upstream community to do whatever we want. So if we have demand for it, we can continue with patch (bug fix) releases in 2.6.x beyond that timeframe. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @mcaveety . I understand why there might be some confusion because the 2.6.x releases have a
.Final
on them and the 3.x ones do not.The reason is that Red Hat used to have a version format requirement for all projects. The format of the version needed to be
major.minor.patch.[Final|RC#]
. So all released versions were of that format, for example:1.7.3.Final
2.0.0.CR1
5.6.22.Final
That formatting is no longer a requirement, so we (the Apicurio team) have dropped the
.Final
from our 3.x releases.As for support of 2.6.x vs. 3.0 - I cannot give you a specific timeline for when we would stop supporting 2.6.x, but please consider it deprecated. Red Hat's product (Red Hat build of Apicuri…