You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/learning-paths/servers-and-cloud-computing/cassandra-on-gcp/benchmnarking.md
+7-28Lines changed: 7 additions & 28 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -335,30 +335,8 @@ END
335
335
-**GC metrics (Garbage Collection):** Shows whether JVM garbage collection paused Cassandra during the test.
336
336
-**Total operation time:** The total wall-clock time taken to run the benchmark.
337
337
338
-
### Benchmark summary on x86_64
339
-
To compare the benchmark results, the following results were collected by running the same benchmark on a `x86 - c4-standard-4` (4 vCPUs, 15 GB Memory) x86_64 VM in GCP, running SUSE:
@@ -378,11 +356,12 @@ Results from the earlier run on the `c4a-standard-4` (4 vCPU, 16 GB memory) Arm6
378
356
| Total GC Time | 0.0 s | 0.0 s |
379
357
| Total Operation Time | 0:00:00 | 0:00:02 |
380
358
381
-
### Cassendra performance benchmarking comparison on Arm64 and x86_64
382
-
When you compare the benchmarking results, you will notice that on the Google Axion C4A Arm-based instances:
359
+
### Cassendra performance benchmarking notes
360
+
When examining the benchmark results, you will notice that on the Google Axion C4A Arm-based instances:
383
361
384
362
- The write operations achieved a high throughput of **10,690 op/s**, while read operations reached **4,962 op/s** on the `c4a-standard-4` Arm64 VM.
385
-
- Latency for writes was lower (mean: **3.7 ms**) compared to reads (mean: **6.3 ms**), indicating faster write processing on this setup.
386
-
- The 95th and 99th percentile latencies show consistent performance, with writes significantly faster than reads (write 95th: **9.5 ms** vs read 95th: **17.4 ms**).
363
+
- Latency for writes was very low (mean: **3.7 ms**) compared to reads (mean: **6.3 ms**), indicating fast write processing on this Arm64 VM.
364
+
- The 95th and 99th percentile latencies show consistent performance, with writes significantly faster than reads.
387
365
- There were no errors or GC overhead, confirming stable and reliable benchmarking results.
388
-
- Overall, the Arm64 VM provides efficient and predictable performance, making it suitable for high-throughput Cassandra workloads.
366
+
367
+
Overall, the Arm64 VM provides efficient and predictable performance, making it suitable for high-throughput Cassandra workloads.
0 commit comments