Skip to content

Conversation

nakul16168
Copy link
Contributor

…linked service swagger definition for Datafactory and Synapse

Choose a PR Template

Switch to "Preview" on this description then select one of the choices below.

Click here to open a PR for a Data Plane API.

Click here to open a PR for a Control Plane (ARM) API.

Click here to open a PR for only SDK configuration.

…linked service swagger definition for Datafactory and Synapse
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions github-actions bot added ARMReview data-plane resource-manager WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Oct 3, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 3, 2025

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
Swagger Microsoft.DataFactory-DataFactory
Swagger Microsoft.Synapse
Go sdk/resourcemanager/datafactory/armdatafactory
Java com.azure.resourcemanager:azure-resourcemanager-datafactorydatafactory
JavaScript @azure/arm-datafactory
C# Azure.ResourceManager.DataFactory

@github-actions github-actions bot added VersioningReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when versioning review is required NotReadyForARMReview and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Oct 3, 2025
@JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Versioning-Approved-BugFix https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Oct 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required and removed NotReadyForARMReview labels Oct 6, 2025
@mentat9
Copy link
Member

mentat9 commented Oct 6, 2025

@nakul16168 - Please submit the dataplane changes in a separate PR. This repo handles either a CP or DP PR, not a single PR for both. ARM reviewers don't review or approve dataplane changes.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 6, 2025
@nakul16168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mentat9

These changes are simple changes to update the Swagger definition for linked service payload for a single activity. We have been making similar changes for sometime now. Reference PR's:

#36664
#33955

There is no risk involved here as these are new fields.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Oct 14, 2025
@psah434 psah434 added ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review and removed WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Oct 15, 2025
@Jingshu918 Jingshu918 added the PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. label Oct 17, 2025
@Jingshu918 Jingshu918 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2025 00:36
@Jingshu918 Jingshu918 merged commit a39b73b into main Oct 17, 2025
40 of 41 checks passed
@Jingshu918 Jingshu918 deleted the dev/nramanathan/updateHdinsightOndemandLinkedService branch October 17, 2025 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review data-plane PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. resource-manager Versioning-Approved-BugFix https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 VersioningReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when versioning review is required

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants