Skip to content

Add representation of compatibility with some PAML actions #28

@rpgoldman

Description

@rpgoldman

Some questions about requirements:

  • Do we need the ability to represent both necessary and sufficient conditions? Or only one of the two?
  • Do we need negative compatibility? I.e., this container cannot be used in a particular kind of activity (e.g., not the right size for some piece of transfer equipment)?

Please comment with other requirements.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    OntologyThis item relates to extending the container ontologyenhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions