|
| 1 | +# BitGo Open Source Project Governance Model |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Overview |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This document outlines the governance model for BitGo open source software projects. It defines roles, decision-making processes, and community participation guidelines to ensure project sustainability and prevent chaos through forks, abandonment, or other disruptive events. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Mission and Values |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +**Mission**: To create secure, reliable, and innovative cryptocurrency infrastructure that empowers developers and institutions worldwide. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +**Core Values**: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +- Security first: All contributions must prioritize security and reliability |
| 14 | +- Transparency: Open communication and decision-making processes |
| 15 | +- Inclusivity: Welcoming environment for contributors of all backgrounds |
| 16 | +- Quality: High standards for code, documentation, and community interactions |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## Governance Model: Hybrid Meritocracy with Project Lead Oversight |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +BitGo employs a hybrid governance model combining meritocracy principles with clear project leadership structure, suitable for both corporate-backed and community-driven projects. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +## Roles and Responsibilities |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### Project Lead(s) |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- **Appointment**: Selected by BitGo management and community consensus |
| 27 | +- **Responsibilities**: |
| 28 | + - Final authority on project direction and major decisions |
| 29 | + - Oversight of maintainer appointments and removals |
| 30 | + - Strategic planning and roadmap development |
| 31 | + - Community representation and external communication |
| 32 | +- **Term**: 2 years, renewable by consensus |
| 33 | +- **Removal**: By BitGo management or 2/3 community vote |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +### Maintainers |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +- **Appointment**: By Project Lead(s) based on demonstrated merit and commitment |
| 38 | +- **Requirements**: |
| 39 | + - 6+ months of consistent contributions |
| 40 | + - Demonstrated technical expertise in project domain |
| 41 | + - Active community engagement and mentorship |
| 42 | + - Security-conscious development practices |
| 43 | +- **Responsibilities**: |
| 44 | + - Code review and merge authority |
| 45 | + - Issue triage and resolution |
| 46 | + - Release management |
| 47 | + - Community mentorship |
| 48 | +- **Removal**: By Project Lead(s) or 2/3 maintainer vote |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +### Contributors |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +- **Definition**: Anyone who submits code, documentation, or other project improvements |
| 53 | +- **Responsibilities**: |
| 54 | + - Follow contribution guidelines |
| 55 | + - Participate constructively in discussions |
| 56 | + - Respect code of conduct |
| 57 | +- **Rights**: |
| 58 | + - Propose changes and improvements |
| 59 | + - Participate in community discussions |
| 60 | + - Vote on certain governance matters |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +### Community Members |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +- **Definition**: Users, advocates, and supporters of the project |
| 65 | +- **Responsibilities**: |
| 66 | + - Provide feedback and bug reports |
| 67 | + - Help other users |
| 68 | + - Promote project adoption |
| 69 | +- **Rights**: |
| 70 | + - Access to all project resources |
| 71 | + - Participation in community discussions |
| 72 | + - Voting on non-technical governance matters |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +## Decision-Making Process |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +### Technical Decisions |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +1. **Minor Changes**: Maintainer approval required |
| 79 | +2. **Major Features**: Maintainer consensus + Project Lead approval |
| 80 | +3. **Breaking Changes**: Community discussion + 2/3 maintainer vote + Project Lead approval |
| 81 | +4. **Security Issues**: Immediate Project Lead + Security team review |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +### Governance Decisions |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +1. **Role Appointments**: Project Lead decision with community input |
| 86 | +2. **Governance Changes**: Community discussion + 2/3 contributor vote + Project Lead approval |
| 87 | +3. **Project Direction**: Project Lead decision with maintainer consultation |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +### Conflict Resolution |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +1. **Level 1**: Direct discussion between parties |
| 92 | +2. **Level 2**: Mediation by a neutral maintainer |
| 93 | +3. **Level 3**: Project Lead intervention |
| 94 | +4. **Level 4**: BitGo management involvement (for corporate projects) |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## Proposal Process |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +### Feature Proposals |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +1. Create GitHub issue with "proposal" label |
| 101 | +2. Community discussion period (minimum 1 week) |
| 102 | +3. Technical review by maintainers |
| 103 | +4. Implementation plan and timeline |
| 104 | +5. Approval by relevant maintainers and Project Lead |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +### Governance Changes |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +1. Create GitHub issue with "governance" label |
| 109 | +2. Community discussion period (minimum 2 weeks) |
| 110 | +3. Draft proposal with specific changes |
| 111 | +4. Community vote (2/3 majority required) |
| 112 | +5. Project Lead final approval |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +## Communication Channels |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +### Primary Channels |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +- **GitHub Issues/PRs**: Technical discussions and proposals |
| 119 | +- **GitHub Discussions**: Community questions and general topics |
| 120 | +- **Security **: [email protected] for security-related issues |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +### Secondary Channels |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +- **Documentation**: Project README and wiki |
| 125 | +- **Releases**: GitHub releases with detailed changelogs |
| 126 | +- **Community Events**: Regular maintainer meetings (monthly) |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +## Code of Conduct |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +All participants must adhere to the [Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct.html), adapted for BitGo projects: |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +- Be respectful and inclusive |
| 133 | +- Focus on constructive criticism |
| 134 | +- Respect different viewpoints and experiences |
| 135 | +- Accept responsibility for mistakes |
| 136 | +- Show empathy towards other community members |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +## Security and Compliance |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +### Security Requirements |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +- All code must pass security review before merge |
| 143 | +- Security vulnerabilities must be reported privately |
| 144 | +- Regular security audits and dependency updates |
| 145 | +- Compliance with relevant financial regulations |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### Legal and Compliance |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +- All contributions must be compatible with Apache 2.0 license |
| 150 | +- Contributors must sign CLA (Contributor License Agreement) |
| 151 | +- Compliance with applicable laws and regulations |
| 152 | +- Regular legal review of governance and processes |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +## Project Lifecycle Management |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +### Project Initiation |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +1. Define project scope and objectives |
| 159 | +2. Establish initial governance structure |
| 160 | +3. Create contribution guidelines |
| 161 | +4. Set up communication channels |
| 162 | +5. Document security and compliance requirements |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +### Ongoing Management |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +1. Regular maintainer meetings |
| 167 | +2. Quarterly project health reviews |
| 168 | +3. Annual governance model review |
| 169 | +4. Continuous community engagement |
| 170 | +5. Regular security and compliance audits |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +### Project Transition/End-of-Life |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +1. 6-month advance notice for major changes |
| 175 | +2. Community discussion and feedback period |
| 176 | +3. Migration assistance and documentation |
| 177 | +4. Archive of project resources |
| 178 | +5. Clear communication of next steps |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +## Succession Planning |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +### Project Lead Succession |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +1. Identify potential successors (internal and external) |
| 185 | +2. 6-month transition period |
| 186 | +3. Knowledge transfer and mentorship |
| 187 | +4. Community approval process |
| 188 | +5. Gradual handover of responsibilities |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +### Maintainer Succession |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +1. Regular evaluation of maintainer activity |
| 193 | +2. Proactive identification of new maintainers |
| 194 | +3. Mentorship and training programs |
| 195 | +4. Gradual increase in responsibilities |
| 196 | +5. Community recognition and support |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +## Metrics and Evaluation |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +### Project Health Metrics |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | +- Contributor activity and retention |
| 203 | +- Issue resolution time |
| 204 | +- Security vulnerability response time |
| 205 | +- Community engagement levels |
| 206 | +- Adoption and usage statistics |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +### Governance Effectiveness |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +- Decision-making efficiency |
| 211 | +- Conflict resolution success rate |
| 212 | +- Community satisfaction surveys |
| 213 | +- Maintainer and contributor retention |
| 214 | +- Project sustainability indicators |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | +## Amendment Process |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | +This governance model may be amended through the following process: |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +1. **Proposal**: Create GitHub issue with detailed amendment proposal |
| 221 | +2. **Discussion**: 2-week community discussion period |
| 222 | +3. **Review**: Maintainer review and feedback |
| 223 | +4. **Vote**: Community vote requiring 2/3 majority |
| 224 | +5. **Approval**: Project Lead final approval |
| 225 | +6. **Implementation**: Update documentation and communicate changes |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +## Conclusion |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +This governance model provides a framework for sustainable, transparent, and inclusive open source project management. It balances corporate oversight with community autonomy, ensuring both security and innovation while preventing project fragmentation or abandonment. |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | +Regular review and adaptation of this model ensures it remains effective as projects grow and evolve. |
| 232 | + |
| 233 | +--- |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +_Last updated: January 2025_ |
| 236 | +_Version: 1.0_ |
0 commit comments