Merge pull request #423 from csralvall/fix-13_1

Fix typos in chapter 13.1

Author: shannona

13_1_Writing_Puzzle_Scripts.md

@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ This is a nice script because it shows careful use of logic (with the `OP_NOT` a
 
 `btcdeb` can be run to prove the collision (and the script):
 ```
-btcdeb $ btcdeb '[255044462d312e330a25e2e3cfd30a0a0a312030206f626a0a3c3c2f57696474682032203020522f4865696768742033203020522f547970652034203020522f537562747970652035203020522f46696c7465722036203020522f436f6c6f7253706163652037203020522f4c656e6774682038203020522f42697473506572436f6d706f6e656e7420383e3e0a73747265616d0affd8fffe00245348412d3120697320646561642121212121852fec092339759c39b1a1c63c4c97e1fffe017f46dc93a6b67e013b029aaa1db2560b45ca67d688c7f84b8c4c791fe02b3df614f86db1690901c56b45c1530afedfb76038e972722fe7ad728f0e4904e046c230570fe9d41398abe12ef5bc942be33542a4802d98b5d70f2a332ec37fac3514e74ddc0f2cc1a874cd0c78305a21566461309789606bd0bf3f98cda8044629a1 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 OP_2DUP OP_EQUAL OP_NOT OP_VERIFY OP_SHA1 OP_SWAP OP_SHA1 OP_EQUAL']
+$ btcdeb '[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 OP_2DUP OP_EQUAL OP_NOT OP_VERIFY OP_SHA1 OP_SWAP OP_SHA1 OP_EQUAL']
 ```
 
 Peter Todd's other [bounties](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=293382.0) remain unclaimed at the time of this writing. They're all written in the same manner as the SHA-1 example above.
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ Here's where the security falls down:
 
 First, anyone can redeem them without knowing much of a secret. They do have to have the `redeemScript`, which offers some protection, but once they do, that's probably the only secret that's necessary — unless your puzzle is _really_ tough, such as a computational puzzle.
 
-Second, the actual redemption isn't secure. Normally, a Bitcoin transction is protected by the signature. Because the signature covers the transaction, no one on the network can rewrite that transaction to instead send to their address without invalidating the signature (and thus the transaction). That isn't true with a transactions whose inputs are just numbers. Anyone could grab the transaction and rewrite it to allow them to steal the funds. If they can get their transaction into a block before yours, they win, and you don't get the puzzle money. There are solutions for this, but they involve mining the block yourself or having a trusted pool mine it, and neither of those options is rational for an average Bitcoin user. 
+Second, the actual redemption isn't secure. Normally, a Bitcoin transaction is protected by the signature. Because the signature covers the transaction, no one on the network can rewrite that transaction to instead send to their address without invalidating the signature (and thus the transaction). That isn't true with a transactions whose inputs are just numbers. Anyone could grab the transaction and rewrite it to allow them to steal the funds. If they can get their transaction into a block before yours, they win, and you don't get the puzzle money. There are solutions for this, but they involve mining the block yourself or having a trusted pool mine it, and neither of those options is rational for an average Bitcoin user. 
 
 Yet, Peter Todd's cryptographic bounties prove that puzzle scripts do have some real-world application.