You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: 09_2_Running_a_Bitcoin_Script.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Bitcoin Scripts are run from left to right. That sounds easy enough, because it'
12
12
13
13
For example, if you were adding together "1" and "2", your Bitcoin Script for that would be `1 2 OP_ADD`, _not_ "1 + 2". Since we know that OP_ADD operator takes two inputs, we know that the two inputs before it are its operands.
14
14
15
-
> :warning:**WARNING:** Technically, everything in Bitcoin Script is an opcode, thus it would be most appropriate to record the above example as `OP_1 OP_2 OP_ADD`. In our examples, we don't worry about how the constants will be evaluated, as that's a topic of translation, as is explained in [§8.2: Building the Structure of P2SH](10_2_Building_the_Structure_of_P2SH.md). Some writers prefer to also leave the "OP" prefix off all operators, but we have opted not to.
15
+
> :warning:**WARNING:** Technically, everything in Bitcoin Script is an opcode, thus it would be most appropriate to record the above example as `OP_1 OP_2 OP_ADD`. In our examples, we don't worry about how the constants will be evaluated, as that's a topic of translation, as is explained in [§10.2: Building the Structure of P2SH](10_2_Building_the_Structure_of_P2SH.md). Some writers prefer to also leave the "OP" prefix off all operators, but we have opted not to.
0 commit comments