Auto merge of rust-lang#127244 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-px1vahe, r=matthiaskrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#126883 (Parenthesize break values containing leading label)
 - rust-lang#127136 (Fix `FnMut::call_mut`/`Fn::call` shim for async closures that capture references)
 - rust-lang#127146 (Uplift fast rejection to new solver)
 - rust-lang#127152 (Bootstrap: Try renaming the file if removing fails)
 - rust-lang#127168 (Use the aligned size for alloca at args/ret when the pass mode is cast)
 - rust-lang#127203 (Fix import suggestion error when path segment failed not from starting)
 - rust-lang#127212 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#127224 (Make `FloatTy` checks exhaustive in pretty print)
 - rust-lang#127230 (chore: remove duplicate words)
 - rust-lang#127243 (Add test for adt_const_params)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Author: bors

compiler/rustc_ast/src/util/classify.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 //! Routines the parser and pretty-printer use to classify AST nodes.
 
 use crate::ast::ExprKind::*;
-use crate::{ast, token::Delimiter};
+use crate::ast::{self, MatchKind};
+use crate::token::Delimiter;
 
 /// This classification determines whether various syntactic positions break out
 /// of parsing the current expression (true) or continue parsing more of the
@@ -81,6 +82,82 @@ pub fn expr_requires_semi_to_be_stmt(e: &ast::Expr) -> bool {
     }
 }
 
+/// Returns whether the leftmost token of the given expression is the label of a
+/// labeled loop or block, such as in `'inner: loop { break 'inner 1 } + 1`.
+///
+/// Such expressions are not allowed as the value of an unlabeled break.
+///
+/// ```ignore (illustrative)
+/// 'outer: {
+///     break 'inner: loop { break 'inner 1 } + 1;  // invalid syntax
+///
+///     break 'outer 'inner: loop { break 'inner 1 } + 1;  // okay
+///
+///     break ('inner: loop { break 'inner 1 } + 1);  // okay
+///
+///     break ('inner: loop { break 'inner 1 }) + 1;  // okay
+/// }
+/// ```
+pub fn leading_labeled_expr(mut expr: &ast::Expr) -> bool {
+    loop {
+        match &expr.kind {
+            Block(_, label) | ForLoop { label, .. } | Loop(_, label, _) | While(_, _, label) => {
+                return label.is_some();
+            }
+
+            Assign(e, _, _)
+            | AssignOp(_, e, _)
+            | Await(e, _)
+            | Binary(_, e, _)
+            | Call(e, _)
+            | Cast(e, _)
+            | Field(e, _)
+            | Index(e, _, _)
+            | Match(e, _, MatchKind::Postfix)
+            | Range(Some(e), _, _)
+            | Try(e) => {
+                expr = e;
+            }
+            MethodCall(method_call) => {
+                expr = &method_call.receiver;
+            }
+
+            AddrOf(..)
+            | Array(..)
+            | Become(..)
+            | Break(..)
+            | Closure(..)
+            | ConstBlock(..)
+            | Continue(..)
+            | FormatArgs(..)
+            | Gen(..)
+            | If(..)
+            | IncludedBytes(..)
+            | InlineAsm(..)
+            | Let(..)
+            | Lit(..)
+            | MacCall(..)
+            | Match(_, _, MatchKind::Prefix)
+            | OffsetOf(..)
+            | Paren(..)
+            | Path(..)
+            | Range(None, _, _)
+            | Repeat(..)
+            | Ret(..)
+            | Struct(..)
+            | TryBlock(..)
+            | Tup(..)
+            | Type(..)
+            | Unary(..)
+            | Underscore
+            | Yeet(..)
+            | Yield(..)
+            | Err(..)
+            | Dummy => return false,
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 pub enum TrailingBrace<'a> {
     /// Trailing brace in a macro call, like the one in `x as *const brace! {}`.
     /// We will suggest changing the macro call to a different delimiter.

compiler/rustc_ast_pretty/src/pprust/state/expr.rs

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ use ast::{ForLoopKind, MatchKind};
 use itertools::{Itertools, Position};
 use rustc_ast::ptr::P;
 use rustc_ast::token;
+use rustc_ast::util::classify;
 use rustc_ast::util::literal::escape_byte_str_symbol;
 use rustc_ast::util::parser::{self, AssocOp, Fixity};
 use rustc_ast::{self as ast, BlockCheckMode};
@@ -610,9 +611,12 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> {
                 }
                 if let Some(expr) = opt_expr {
                     self.space();
-                    self.print_expr_maybe_paren(
+                    self.print_expr_cond_paren(
                         expr,
-                        parser::PREC_JUMP,
+                        // Parenthesize if required by precedence, or in the
+                        // case of `break 'inner: loop { break 'inner 1 } + 1`
+                        expr.precedence().order() < parser::PREC_JUMP
+                            || (opt_label.is_none() && classify::leading_labeled_expr(expr)),
                         fixup.subsequent_subexpression(),
                     );
                 }

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/abi.rs

@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ impl<'ll, 'tcx> ArgAbiExt<'ll, 'tcx> for ArgAbi<'tcx, Ty<'tcx>> {
                 //   when passed by value, making it smaller.
                 // - On some ABIs, the Rust layout { u16, u16, u16 } may be padded up to 8 bytes
                 //   when passed by value, making it larger.
-                let copy_bytes = cmp::min(scratch_size.bytes(), self.layout.size.bytes());
+                let copy_bytes =
+                    cmp::min(cast.unaligned_size(bx).bytes(), self.layout.size.bytes());
                 // Allocate some scratch space...
                 let llscratch = bx.alloca(scratch_size, scratch_align);
                 bx.lifetime_start(llscratch, scratch_size);

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/block.rs

@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
             //
             // Why only in unoptimized builds?
             // - In unoptimized builds LLVM uses FastISel which does not support switches, so it
-            //   must fall back to the to the slower SelectionDAG isel. Therefore, using `br` gives
+            //   must fall back to the slower SelectionDAG isel. Therefore, using `br` gives
             //   significant compile time speedups for unoptimized builds.
             // - In optimized builds the above doesn't hold, and using `br` sometimes results in
             //   worse generated code because LLVM can no longer tell that the value being switched
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
                 //   when passed by value, making it smaller.
                 // - On some ABIs, the Rust layout { u16, u16, u16 } may be padded up to 8 bytes
                 //   when passed by value, making it larger.
-                let copy_bytes = cmp::min(scratch_size.bytes(), arg.layout.size.bytes());
+                let copy_bytes = cmp::min(cast.unaligned_size(bx).bytes(), arg.layout.size.bytes());
                 // Allocate some scratch space...
                 let llscratch = bx.alloca(scratch_size, scratch_align);
                 bx.lifetime_start(llscratch, scratch_size);

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/locals.rs

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
                     let expected_ty = self.monomorphize(self.mir.local_decls[local].ty);
                     if expected_ty != op.layout.ty {
                         warn!(
-                            "Unexpected initial operand type: expected {expected_ty:?}, found {:?}.\
+                            "Unexpected initial operand type:\nexpected {expected_ty:?},\nfound    {:?}.\n\
                             See <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114858>.",
                             op.layout.ty
                         );

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs

@@ -230,10 +230,20 @@ pub fn codegen_mir<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>(
             let layout = start_bx.layout_of(fx.monomorphize(decl.ty));
             assert!(!layout.ty.has_erasable_regions());
 
-            if local == mir::RETURN_PLACE && fx.fn_abi.ret.is_indirect() {
-                debug!("alloc: {:?} (return place) -> place", local);
-                let llretptr = start_bx.get_param(0);
-                return LocalRef::Place(PlaceRef::new_sized(llretptr, layout));
+            if local == mir::RETURN_PLACE {
+                match fx.fn_abi.ret.mode {
+                    PassMode::Indirect { .. } => {
+                        debug!("alloc: {:?} (return place) -> place", local);
+                        let llretptr = start_bx.get_param(0);
+                        return LocalRef::Place(PlaceRef::new_sized(llretptr, layout));
+                    }
+                    PassMode::Cast { ref cast, .. } => {
+                        debug!("alloc: {:?} (return place) -> place", local);
+                        let size = cast.size(&start_bx);
+                        return LocalRef::Place(PlaceRef::alloca_size(&mut start_bx, size, layout));
+                    }
+                    _ => {}
+                };
             }
 
             if memory_locals.contains(local) {

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/place.rs

@@ -108,9 +108,17 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, V: CodegenObject> PlaceRef<'tcx, V> {
     pub fn alloca<Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx, Value = V>>(
         bx: &mut Bx,
         layout: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
+    ) -> Self {
+        Self::alloca_size(bx, layout.size, layout)
+    }
+
+    pub fn alloca_size<Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx, Value = V>>(
+        bx: &mut Bx,
+        size: Size,
+        layout: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
     ) -> Self {
         assert!(layout.is_sized(), "tried to statically allocate unsized place");
-        PlaceValue::alloca(bx, layout.size, layout.align.abi).with_type(layout)
+        PlaceValue::alloca(bx, size, layout.align.abi).with_type(layout)
     }
 
     /// Returns a place for an indirect reference to an unsized place.

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/discriminant.rs

@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ impl<'tcx, M: Machine<'tcx>> InterpCx<'tcx, M> {
                 // The tag of a `Single` enum is like the tag of the niched
                 // variant: there's no tag as the discriminant is encoded
                 // entirely implicitly. If `write_discriminant` ever hits this
-                // case, we do a "validation read" to ensure the the right
+                // case, we do a "validation read" to ensure the right
                 // discriminant is encoded implicitly, so any attempt to write
                 // the wrong discriminant for a `Single` enum will reliably
                 // result in UB.

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/method/suggest.rs

@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     }
                 }
 
-                // If the shadowed binding has an an itializer expression,
+                // If the shadowed binding has an itializer expression,
                 // use the initializer expression'ty to try to find the method again.
                 // For example like:  `let mut x = Vec::new();`,
                 // `Vec::new()` is the itializer expression.
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             }
 
             // Make sure that, if any traits other than the found ones were involved,
-            // we don't don't report an unimplemented trait.
+            // we don't report an unimplemented trait.
             // We don't want to say that `iter::Cloned` is not an iterator, just
             // because of some non-Clone item being iterated over.
             for (predicate, _parent_pred, _cause) in unsatisfied_predicates {
@@ -2129,7 +2129,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             let target_ty = self
                 .autoderef(sugg_span, rcvr_ty)
                 .find(|(rcvr_ty, _)| {
-                    DeepRejectCtxt { treat_obligation_params: TreatParams::AsCandidateKey }
+                    DeepRejectCtxt::new(self.tcx, TreatParams::ForLookup)
                         .types_may_unify(*rcvr_ty, impl_ty)
                 })
                 .map_or(impl_ty, |(ty, _)| ty)

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/closure.rs

@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
 /// Eg: 1. `foo.x` which is represented using `projections=[Field(x)]` is an ancestor of
 ///        `foo.x.y` which is represented using `projections=[Field(x), Field(y)]`.
 ///        Note both `foo.x` and `foo.x.y` start off of the same root variable `foo`.
-///     2. Since we only look at the projections here function will return `bar.x` as an a valid
+///     2. Since we only look at the projections here function will return `bar.x` as a valid
 ///        ancestor of `foo.x.y`. It's the caller's responsibility to ensure that both projections
 ///        list are being applied to the same root variable.
 pub fn is_ancestor_or_same_capture(