Replies: 4 comments 13 replies
-
|
我认为是可以的，毕竟开那么多PR，开的人累，审核的也累 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
以前的全局查找替换不也是一个pr里提交的，比如#1646 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
显然这类批量替换类 PR 不能分开。 discussion 的具体用法？ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
discussion都不能连接到pr/issue（pr/issue下面不会有被链接的提示消息） |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
提议：当多个模组行数之和小于 100 行时，建议用户合并为一个 PR 提交。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
其实是个灵活标准 约多少行 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
那就会陷入车轮战 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
每个模组都小于60行且所有模组行数加起来小于200行这种？ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
建议bot自动化 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
建议200 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
不支持，一旦发生某个模组需要大量讨论，会影响其它正常需要合并或拒绝的模组翻译，应当分开处理。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
某个模组阻止合并这一问题可以通过简单地删除它来解决。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
感觉不如拆开 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
可以把已经通过的部分cherry-pick出来，然后剩下的接着审核吧 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
起因：@XiaoXin1113 最近提交了数十个仅有几行（很少一部分是几十行）的模组翻译。
是否应该放开小模组多合一的限制，有何利弊？
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions