DLT Viewer license MPL2 vs AUTOSAR #754
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hi @pdrunin-qs, What is your intent with usage of or contribution to this codebase? Which organization are you with? Regards, Paul Boyes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @paulboyes , I was intending to use the dlt-daemon + dlt viewer outside of AUTOSAR/Automotive industry, in UAV area for debugging purposes, as I liked the idea how we could dynamically change the tracing levels for apps/ids for example, etc, but after double checking the license requirement now took different open source projects, as this basically seems not to be freely usable i.e. a paid AUTOSAR license is required, and decided to start this discussion in order to make this more transparent, so it is faster to understand from others, or I could got it wrong too. BR, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
dlt-daemon is using an AUTOSAR standardized protocol "https://www.autosar.org/fileadmin/standards/R22-11/CP/AUTOSAR_SWS_DiagnosticLogAndTrace.pdf" so it obliges actually the AUTOSAR license policy as well and not only the MPL2, i.e. altought dlt-daemon is marked as MPL2 it still can not be used in any SW without a License from Autosar, is this really the case ?
basically this is the Disclaimer from Autosar regarding the standardized protocol that is being used by dlt daemon:
...
This work may be utilized or reproduced without any modification, in any form or by
any means, for informational purposes only. For any other purpose, no part of the
work may be utilized or reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission
in writing from the publisher.
...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions