Huh. I thought I commented on this already. I apologize if you get a duplicate message!
What do you think about taking io.js' CLA instead? It seems a little more lenient than the one you're using, and I know the io.js people have been thinking about this kind of thing a lot.

That CLA would work just fine.

Can we get the CLA added with either wording (Michael's pull request or io.js). Either wording would allow Eclipse Orion to use newer versions of csslint and the parser.

/CC @stubbornella

Is it "CSSLint" or "CSS Lint"? The homepage and most documentation makes me think it's CSS Lint, so with a space. However, there are also plenty of cases of "CSSLint".

Do we want to share this with the other CSS Lint projects? If yes, then maybe the "CSS Lint project" needs to be rephrased to something like "the projects maintained by the CSS Lint organisation"

I'd go with CSSLint but @stubbornella should know better.

Let's do a space, "CSS Lint"

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:37 PM, XhmikosR [email protected] wrote:

I'd go with CSSLint but @stubbornella should know better.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#585 (comment)

@mrennie can you please make the small changes that were proposed? Thanks.

I ended up having to create a new pull request (#637), so I'm closing this one.