Adopting the "RFD to introduce an RFD process" #412
Closed
alilleybrinker
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 3 comments
-
Maybe we just make it a rule to vote and provide a comment (for tracking) at the same time. I vote yes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I also vote yes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Closing, as the period for the vote ended. The proposal is currently in a Final Comment Period with a disposition to Accept this week if no new issues are raised before 1pm PDT / 4pm EDT Thursday, June 19th. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is a poll of QWG participants on whether the group supports adopting the "RFD to introduce an RFD process" (#405).
This poll is not binding.
If you have feedback on the RFD and believe this poll is premature, please comment on the pull request (#405) with your feedback.
This poll will close at the start of the next QWG meeting on May 22nd.
4 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions