Replies: 2 comments
-
|
To begin with, you could try to adjust those options: cadquery/cadquery/occ_impl/solver.py Line 704 in fe53ca0 It would be interesting to have a MRE |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Thanks for your reply. It turns out that the issue was caused by a wrong constraint I was imposing. I didn't include a MRE because I was not able to reproduce the issue in a simple case. Trying to simplify my model while still exhibiting the issue I found the impossible constraint. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using cadquery to model a geometry that contains components that are separated by fairly small angles (of the order of on degree) but have large aspect ration (of order of a hundred) such that even minute misalignment results in non negligible errors in the positions of some vertexes. I observe the position of some vertexes to be computed inaccurately by the constraints solver. Indeed, increasing the verbosity of the solver, I see that the solver ends with
EXIT: Solved To Acceptable Level.while it usually ends withEXIT: Optimal Solution Found.Is there a way to improve the accuracy of the solver?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions